Open Stack

Ryan, Tim,

This looks great.
Do we want to mention anything short term that will be done during the next Summit, for example :
 - Report on initial user poll
 - Present the user committee structure and plan

Thanks,

JC

From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:10:14 +0000
To: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org<mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org>>
Cc: JC Martin <jcmartin at eBaysf.com<mailto:jcmartin at eBaysf.com>>, "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February


Ryan,

One extra thing, I think a slide with the initial scope would be useful to show the board. Currently, the points to review document has the following:

define the long term bylaws for the user committee
define the categories of different users that the user committee will represent
consolidate user needs and present them to the technical committee and management board with proposed action plans
keep track of users and their usage of OpenStack for the purpose of providing aggregate statistics to the foundation while maintaining confidentiality/anonymity as required
work with the OpenStack community managers to further expand the worldwide user group structures and keep them vibrant and informed

Tim

From: Tim Bell
Sent: 10 February 2013 11:07
To: 'Ryan Lane'
Cc: JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February


Do we need to be more explicit on where we could do with some help ?


-          For the bylaws, I think we’re going to need some foundation help to get from the current ideas to something formal

-          Supporting the CRM configuration for our needs

With only 15 minutes, it is tough to highlight the areas of debate such as


-          What is a user (from end user with the tools/CLI through ecosystem partner through to private cloud ‘runner’)

-          What is a manageable size of committee ?

Tim

From: Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org]
Sent: 09 February 2013 23:49
To: Tim Bell
Cc: JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

I've created a presentation in google drive and shared it with both of you.

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>> wrote:

Thanks, that would be great to get a start and then we review together…

Tim

From: JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com<mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com>]
Sent: 05 February 2013 18:18
To: Ryan Lane; Tim Bell
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>

Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

Ryan,

Since the 12th is approaching, do you want to give a shot at the preso and we can help/review ?

Thanks,

JC

From: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org<mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org>>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 04:42:37 -0800
To: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>>
Cc: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

Sounds good.

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>> wrote:

Ryan/JC,

Jonathan has given his OK for one of you to present in person at the next board meeting on 12th February.

My default would be to propose Ryan since he’s in SF .. would this be OK ?

We need to work together to define the


-          Current status

-          Strategic priorities for 2013

-          Next steps

Tim

From: Tim Bell
Sent: 01 February 2013 10:56
To: 'JC Martin'; user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January

Ryan/JC,

Thanks for the replies.

I’m checking back with the board to see if attendence for the user related part of the session is OK.

Tim

From: JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com]
Sent: 01 February 2013 02:52
To: Tim Bell; user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January

I am not too far from SF, and could make it there in person of it's better.

JC

From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch>>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:37:37 +0000
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January


Ryan/JC,

Although there was a scheduled agenda item on the foundation board for an update on the user committee, other items had overrun and the item was postponed to the February 12th meeting in San Francisco (Rackspace offices).

Are either of you in San Francisco on the 12th ? I will be connected remotely but if the board would like a status update, I could see if physical presence would be preferred by one of the committee.

Tim

_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130211/dca7fe6d/attachment-0001.html>