Open Stack

Ryan,

 

One extra thing, I think a slide with the initial scope would be useful to
show the board. Currently, the points to review document has the following:

 

define the long term bylaws for the user committee

define the categories of different users that the user committee will
represent

consolidate user needs and present them to the technical committee and
management board with proposed action plans

keep track of users and their usage of OpenStack for the purpose of
providing aggregate statistics to the foundation while maintaining
confidentiality/anonymity as required

work with the OpenStack community managers to further expand the worldwide
user group structures and keep them vibrant and informed

 

Tim

 

From: Tim Bell 
Sent: 10 February 2013 11:07
To: 'Ryan Lane'
Cc: JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

 

 

Do we need to be more explicit on where we could do with some help ?

 

-          For the bylaws, I think we're going to need some foundation help
to get from the current ideas to something formal

-          Supporting the CRM configuration for our needs

 

With only 15 minutes, it is tough to highlight the areas of debate such as

 

-          What is a user (from end user with the tools/CLI through
ecosystem partner through to private cloud 'runner') 

-          What is a manageable size of committee ?

 

Tim

 

From: Ryan Lane [mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org] 
Sent: 09 February 2013 23:49
To: Tim Bell
Cc: JC Martin; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> 
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

 

I've created a presentation in google drive and shared it with both of you.

 

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch
<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> > wrote:

 

Thanks, that would be great to get a start and then we review together. 

 

Tim

 

From: JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com <mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com> ] 
Sent: 05 February 2013 18:18
To: Ryan Lane; Tim Bell
Cc: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> 


Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

 

Ryan,

 

Since the 12th is approaching, do you want to give a shot at the preso and
we can help/review ?

 

Thanks,

 

JC

 

From: Ryan Lane <rlane at wikimedia.org <mailto:rlane at wikimedia.org> >
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 04:42:37 -0800
To: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch <mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> >
Cc: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> "
<user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> >
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 12th February

 

Sounds good.

 

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch
<mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> > wrote:

 

Ryan/JC,

 

Jonathan has given his OK for one of you to present in person at the next
board meeting on 12th February.

 

My default would be to propose Ryan since he's in SF .. would this be OK ?

 

We need to work together to define the

 

-          Current status

-          Strategic priorities for 2013

-          Next steps

 

Tim

 

From: Tim Bell 
Sent: 01 February 2013 10:56
To: 'JC Martin'; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> 
Subject: RE: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January

 

Ryan/JC,

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

I'm checking back with the board to see if attendence for the user related
part of the session is OK.

 

Tim

 

From: JC Martin [mailto:jcmartin at ebaysf.com] 
Sent: 01 February 2013 02:52
To: Tim Bell; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> 
Subject: Re: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January

 

I am not too far from SF, and could make it there in person of it's better.

 

JC

 

From: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch <mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch> >
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:37:37 +0000
To: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> "
<user-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org> >
Subject: [User-committee] Board meeting 31st January

 

 

Ryan/JC,

 

Although there was a scheduled agenda item on the foundation board for an
update on the user committee, other items had overrun and the item was
postponed to the February 12th meeting in San Francisco (Rackspace offices).

 

Are either of you in San Francisco on the 12th ? I will be connected
remotely but if the board would like a status update, I could see if
physical presence would be preferred by one of the committee.

 

Tim

 

_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee 


_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

 

_______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org
<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130210/334a993b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5215 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20130210/334a993b/attachment-0001.bin>