[Transparency] Transparency Committee - Quick meeting before Thursday?
Joshua McKenty
joshua at pistoncloud.com
Tue Oct 1 20:58:09 UTC 2013
Tristan, I'm joshuamckenty on Skype. I'm available for the next hour.
--
Joshua McKenty
Chief Technology Officer
Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
+1 (650) 242-5683
+1 (650) 283-6846
http://www.pistoncloud.com
"Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!"
"Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one ever has."
On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:50 PM, Lauren Sell <lauren at openstack.org> wrote:
> Yes, or I could talk in 45 minutes like Kyle mentioned.
>
> Either way, I'm happy to meet again tomorrow if anyone else is available to make sure we have all the updates.
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Tristan Goode <tristan at aptira.com> wrote:
>
>> I can invite you both into a Skype conference in 20 mins. Will that work for you both?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Joshua McKenty [mailto:joshua at pistoncloud.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2013 5:43 AM
>> To: Lauren Sell
>> Cc: transparency at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [Transparency] Transparency Committee - Quick meeting before Thursday?
>>
>> Let's do it.
>> --
>>
>> Joshua McKenty
>> Chief Technology Officer
>> Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
>> +1 (650) 242-5683
>> +1 (650) 283-6846
>> http://www.pistoncloud.com
>>
>> "Oh, Westley, we'll never survive!"
>> "Nonsense. You're only saying that because no one ever has."
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Lauren Sell <lauren at openstack.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Two people have responded, both of which can meet in about an hour and a half.
>>
>> The only other time suggested was Thursday morning, which might be a bit late.
>>
>> Any other takers? :)
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Lauren Sell <lauren at openstack.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi everyone --
>>
>> Would it make sense to get together briefly so we have a proper update for the board meeting?
>>
>> I would love to get the transparency policy wrapped up and circulated to the Board, so we can approve it during this week's meeting (not sure if it requires a vote), although there are still a few dependencies with the mailing list/doc store and ombudsman plans. We could always publish a v1 and update it once those items are complete.
>>
>> You can see the latest version of the policy here. I spent some time responding to and resolving comments that were made when we originally sent it out to the mailing list for feedback, but there are still a few remaining questions we can discuss: https://docs.google.com/a/openstack.org/document/d/1sGBtza-mjRXcDzFBSS9aUrYlAtu1se-eerHZN16DPyU/edit
>>
>> I know it's short notice, but I've set up a doodle to see if we can get together a significant number: http://doodle.com/4x59xhz7xpcsy6u4
>>
>> Also for reference are our rough notes from the Feb 21 meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/TransparencyWG-Feb21-Agenda
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lauren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Transparency mailing list
>> Transparency at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/transparency
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/transparency/attachments/20131001/c7d6efb9/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Transparency
mailing list