[Product] OpenStack Product Work Group - Weekly Meeting

Kenny Johnston kenny at kencjohnston.com
Tue Mar 29 18:53:28 UTC 2016


Yeah I'd agree. I'm not sure what the value of a topic branch is in this
context. So regardless of immediate impact I'd like to hear the arguments
for suggesting this be a standard we set.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:25 PM, <Arkady_Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

> Steve,
> I do not want to be a stickler here.
> I am happy to apply that rule, once documented, for the future submission
> and not retroactively. And will be happy to revert my -1 for it.
> Thanks,
> Arkady
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Gordon [mailto:sgordon at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 1:11 PM
> To: Carol L Barrett
> Cc: OpenStack Product Work Group ; Robert Armstrong ; Victor H Diaz ;
> Nicole K Rutherford
> Subject: Re: [Product] OpenStack Product Work Group - Weekly Meeting
>
> Will minutes be distributed for this meeting? I notice a number of open
> patches have been -1'd on the basis that they should have topic branches,
> apparently a decision taken in the meeting, but it's not clear what the
> justification was for applying this retrospectively. The etherpad [1]
> simply says:
>
> "When submitting a user story, use branching with a descriptive name"
>
> From my POV this has always been *recommended* practice but not *required*
> and it seems strange to now apply it as required for this repo (I've never
> had anything -1'd for this in other projects) not only for new submissions
> but to apply it retrospectively.
>
> -Steve
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_3_28__2016
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carol L Barrett"
> > To: "Carol L Barrett" , "Krishnan Raghuram" , "Yih Leong Sun"
> > , "Robert Armstrong" , "Nicole K Rutherford"
> > , "Victor H Diaz"
> > , "Travis V Broughton" ,
> > "OpenStack Product Work Group"
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:25:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Product] OpenStack Product Work Group - Weekly Meeting
> >
> > Team - This is for the 3/28 meeting.
> >
> > We will meet at our standard time, but use a voice line and etherpad,
> > instead of IRC.
> > The dial-in access is: (888) 875-9370, Bridge:3; Pasccode: 9518007 You
> > can find local call in numbers in the etherpad:
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_3_28__2016
> >
> > If you need a call in number for a location not listed, pls let me know.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Carol
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barrett, Carol L [mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 7:55 AM
> > To: Raghuram, Krishnan ; Sun, Yih Leong
> > ; Armstrong, Robert
> > ; Rutherford, Nicole K
> > ; Diaz, Victor H
> > ; Broughton, Travis V ;
> > OpenStack Product Work Group
> > Subject: [Product] OpenStack Product Work Group - Weekly Meeting
> >
> > This week we're using a voice line for the review and prioritization
> > of User Stories
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_3_28__2016
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Product-wg mailing list
> > Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> >
>
> --
> Steve Gordon,
> Principal Product Manager,
> Red Hat OpenStack Platform
>
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>



-- 
Kenny Johnston | irc:kencjohnston | @kencjohnston


More information about the Product-wg mailing list