Open Stack

Bifrost, Ironic-webclient, ironic-ui (horizon), etc. More the latter, as
the former's use case is somewhat more advanced than day-to-day maintenance
of a large amount of metal.

Michael

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:55 AM Sun, Yih Leong <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>
wrote:

> Are you looking at bifrost?
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/bifrost/
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/bifrost/readme.html#use-cases
> https://github.com/openstack/bifrost
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Krotscheck [mailto:krotscheck at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 9:23 AM
> To: product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [Product] Non-Cloud Product Validation
>
> Hello, everyone!
>
> The ironic team is curious as to whether this group has done any work to
> validate product uses for openstack services operating independently. At
> the moment, four of our services don't presume the existence of OpenStack
> (Ironic, Swift, Glance, Neutron), and ironic in particular has just
> conducted UX interviews, where some of our interviewees expressed the
> desire to only have ironic, and only to manage their metal (example:
> Compete with Ubuntu's MAAS).
>
> Has this group discussed these cases at all, or are we more focused
> towards addressing these services in the context of a larger cloud?
>
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> Product-wg mailing list
> Product-wg at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/product-wg
>