<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<STYLE type=text/css> <!--@import url(scrollbar.css); --></STYLE>

<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE>                   body{FONT-SIZE:12pt; FONT-FAMILY:宋体,serif;}         </STYLE>

<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16385"><BASE 
target=_blank></HEAD>
<BODY 
style="LINE-HEIGHT: 1.3; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN: 12px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px" 
marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT 
color=#000000 size=3 face=宋体>Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your 
idea,</FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>Ok, then the last problem is 
how to release the vcpus/mem resources of suspended instances on the 
compute nodes?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑></FONT> </DIV></FONT></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>2014-06-26 11:57 (UTC+8)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>Wangpan</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑>----- Original Message -----</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑>> From: Ricky Saltzer 
<ricky@cloudera.com></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑>> To: 
"Wangpan"<hzwangpan@corp.netease.com><BR>> 
Sent: 2014-06-25 03:58</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑>> Subject: Re: Re: [Openstack] Why doesn't 
suspend release vCPUs/memory?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=微软雅黑>
<TABLE width="100%">
  <TBODY>
  <TR>
    <TD width="100%">
      <BLOCKQUOTE 
      style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
        <DIV dir=ltr>I don't see how there would be a problem if you still 
        enforced a hard limit of the number of instances a user can have. The 
        proposal here is suspending would release <I>only</I> vCPUs and memory, 
        so the user could still potentially exceed their quota by reaching their 
        allotted amount of instances. Let's say 5/10 instances for a user 
        accumulated to 20 vCPUs (4 vCPUs per node), suspending those 5 instances 
        would release the 20 vCPUs back, but those 5 suspended instances would 
        still count towards their total number of instances quota.  
        <BR><BR><BR></DIV>
        <DIV class=gmail_extra><BR><BR>
        <DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Wangpan <SPAN 
        dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:hzwangpan@corp.netease.com" 
        target=_blank>hzwangpan@corp.netease.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
        <BLOCKQUOTE 
        style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" 
        class=gmail_quote><U></U>
          <DIV 
          style="LINE-HEIGHT: 1.3; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; MARGIN: 12px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px" 
          marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
          <DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT 
          color=#000000 size=3 face=宋体>I think if we do this, a serious security 
          risk is imported, think this use 
          case:</FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>1) an user has 
          quotas like 10 instances, 20 vcpus, 100G ram and 200G 
          disks</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>2) he boots 10 
          instances under his quotas</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>3) he suspends all 
          this instances</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>4) he repeats step 
          2&3 day and night</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=微软雅黑><FONT face=宋体>5) then the cloud 
          platform will have no resources to supply 
          eventually</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑></FONT> </DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑><A href="tel:2014-06-24%C2%A011" target=_blank 
          value="+12014062411">2014-06-24 11</A>:17 (UTC+8)</FONT></DIV><SPAN 
          class=HOEnZb><FONT color=#888888>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>Wangpan</FONT></DIV></FONT></SPAN>
          <DIV>
          <DIV class=h5>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑></FONT> </DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>----- Original Message -----</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>> From: Ricky Saltzer <<A 
          href="mailto:ricky@cloudera.com" 
          target=_blank>ricky@cloudera.com</A>></FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>> To: "John Griffith"<<A 
          href="mailto:john.griffith@solidfire.com" 
          target=_blank>john.griffith@solidfire.com</A>><BR>> 
          Sent: <A href="tel:2014-06-24%C2%A001" target=_blank 
          value="+12014062401">2014-06-24 01</A>:05</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Why doesn't suspend 
          release vCPUs/memory?</FONT></DIV>
          <DIV><FONT face=微软雅黑>
          <TABLE width="100%">
            <TBODY>
            <TR>
              <TD width="100%">
                <BLOCKQUOTE 
                style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
                  <DIV dir=ltr>
                  <DIV>That seems to be the case, and I can see where you're 
                  coming from, but if the resources aren't released at the quota 
                  level, then they're effectively being used from a user's point 
                  of view. It would be nice if <I>suspend</I> released resources 
                  after the instance is shutdown, and a <I>resume</I> would 
                  reclaim the resources (provided enough are available). For 
                  instance, if I had 210/210 vCPUs used, and I suspend 
                  <I>instance_a</I> with 1 vCPU, and then launch <I>instance_b 
                  </I>with 1 vCPU...<I>instance_b </I>should successfully 
                  deploy, but resuming <I>instance_a</I> should fail with a 
                  quota exceeded exception.<BR><BR></DIV></DIV>
                  <DIV class=gmail_extra><BR><BR>
                  <DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:54 PM, John 
                  Griffith <SPAN dir=ltr><<A 
                  href="mailto:john.griffith@solidfire.com" 
                  target=_blank>john.griffith@solidfire.com</A>></SPAN> 
                  wrote:<BR>
                  <BLOCKQUOTE 
                  style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" 
                  class=gmail_quote>
                    <DIV dir=ltr>
                    <DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: courier new,monospace" 
                    class=gmail_default><BR></DIV>
                    <DIV class=gmail_extra>
                    <DIV>
                    <DIV><BR><BR>
                    <DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:49 AM, 
                    Ricky Saltzer <SPAN dir=ltr><<A 
                    href="mailto:ricky@cloudera.com" 
                    target=_blank>ricky@cloudera.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
                    <BLOCKQUOTE 
                    style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" 
                    class=gmail_quote>
                      <DIV dir=ltr>Right, the quotas don't seem to be released. 
                      If I have 210/210 vCPUs used, and I suspend an instance 
                      with 4 vCPUs, I still have 210/210 vCPUs used. <BR></DIV>
                      <DIV class=gmail_extra>
                      <DIV>
                      <DIV><BR><BR>
                      <DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:38 AM, 
                      John Griffith <SPAN dir=ltr><<A 
                      href="mailto:john.griffith@solidfire.com" 
                      target=_blank>john.griffith@solidfire.com</A>></SPAN> 
                      wrote:<BR>
                      <BLOCKQUOTE 
                      style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" 
                      class=gmail_quote>
                        <DIV dir=ltr>
                        <DIV class=gmail_extra><BR>
                        <DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:45 AM, 
                        Ricky Saltzer <SPAN dir=ltr><<A 
                        href="mailto:ricky@cloudera.com" 
                        target=_blank>ricky@cloudera.com</A>></SPAN> 
                        wrote:<BR>
                        <BLOCKQUOTE 
                        style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" 
                        class=gmail_quote><A 
                          href="https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/32826/why-doesnt-suspend-release-vcpusmemory/" 
                          target=_blank>https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/32826/why-doesnt-suspend-release-vcpusmemory/</A></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR>
                        <DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'courier new',monospace">​My 
                        understanding was always that the instance is no longer 
                        consuming any resources via the virt layer, so in 
                        essence the resources are in fact freed up on the 
                        Compute Node.  Quotas and such however aren't 
                        modified (which seems correct to me).  Are you 
                        saying you want to see quota's adjusted here? 
                        ​</DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR 
                      clear=all><BR></DIV></DIV>
                      <DIV>-- <BR>
                      <DIV dir=ltr>
                      <DIV>Ricky Saltzer</DIV>
                      <DIV><A href="http://www.cloudera.com" 
                      target=_blank>http://www.cloudera.com</A><BR></DIV>
                      <DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV>
                    <DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'courier new',monospace" 
                    class=gmail_default>​Yeah, I think that makes sense and is 
                    expected, as a user you're still consuming those "items" 
                    even if they're not active.  The alternative would be 
                    (which I think is what you're getting at) to actually deduct 
                    items that are suspended from the tenants quota count. 
                     I guess when I think of it though those resources are 
                    still "reserved" even if they're not in use.  I suppose 
                    you could do this and then if on resume the quota isn't 
                    there we don't actually resume... but I think this could be 
                    argued either way.</DIV>
                    <DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'courier new',monospace" 
                    class=gmail_default><BR></DIV>
                    <DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'courier new',monospace" 
                    class=gmail_default>Maybe seperate quotas for active vs 
                    suspended? 
                   ​</DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR 
                  clear=all><BR>-- <BR>
                  <DIV dir=ltr>
                  <DIV>Ricky Saltzer</DIV>
                  <DIV><A href="http://www.cloudera.com" 
                  target=_blank>http://www.cloudera.com</A><BR></DIV>
                  <DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FONT><FONT 
          face="Times New Roman"></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR 
        clear=all><BR>-- <BR>
        <DIV dir=ltr>
        <DIV>Ricky Saltzer</DIV>
        <DIV><A href="http://www.cloudera.com" 
        target=_blank>http://www.cloudera.com</A><BR></DIV>
        <DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FONT><FONT 
size=2 face="Times New Roman"></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>