<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Xu,<br>
<br>
afaik giving both volume nodes the same 'host' name in cinder.conf
should allow volumes created on one node to be deleted on another
when using Ceph as the backend. As long as both nodes have the
same ceph config/credentials i.e. pool and client settings you
should be good to go.<br>
<br>
On 22/11/13 16:03, Xu (Simon) Chen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGNyuhXGQWa8MVSTxydCYgSTmMuFp4OhUgxv1fBH9dikgOLWkA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am working on an HA setup with multiple cinder-volume
workers. However, I have a single ceph cluster that I want
both workers to front. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>With relatively standard configuration, the volumes created
seem to be tied to a specific worker. This means, if a volume
is created by cinder-volume-1 and that goes down, removing
that volume would be stuck in delete state until
cinder-volume-1 comes back. It would be nice for
cinder-volume-2 to realize it's operating on the same pool as
the other node, and thus remove the volume right away.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Any thoughts?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Simon</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack</a>
Post to : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org">openstack@lists.openstack.org</a>
Unsubscribe : <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>