<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.hoenzb
{mso-style-name:hoenzb;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Note to self: paddle faster. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_____replyseparator"></a><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Boris Renski [mailto:brenski@mirantis.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:02 AM<br><b>To:</b> Thierry Carrez<br><b>Cc:</b> openstack@lists.openstack.org Openstack; <foundation-board@lists.openstack.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Foundation Board] Resolutions from the Technical Committee<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>In this case, statement by Mark below is inaccurate. Until BoD passes the resolution for Heat to call itself, "OpenStack Orchestration" (which I don't believe it has), Heat remains "an integrated project called Heat" and NOT "OpenStack Orchestration" <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Am I getting it right? <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>> *Can* the projects themselves use the word "OpenStack" such as<br>> "OpenStack Orchestration"? Answer: yes absolutely. This is already a<br>> done deal and we are already doing it in practice. And its covered<br>> under the bylaws once they are included in the integrated release by<br>> TC vote. There is no need for further action.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Thierry Carrez <<a href="mailto:thierry@openstack.org" target="_blank">thierry@openstack.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Boris Renski wrote:<br>> None of this answers the question of "what is currently the difference<br>> between core and integrated." I agree with everything you said, but it<br>> sounds to me like *integrated* = *core* at this point.<br><br>Well, no.<br><br>"Integrated" is the list of projects we produce and release together<br>every 6 months. That's fully determined by the TC.<br><br>"The Core OpenStack Project" as defined in the bylaws is the list of<br>projects that can call themselves "OpenStack X". The TC recommends that<br>it's the same as the list of integrated projects, but the BoD may decide<br>to exclude some of those (since the bylaws grant them that power).<br><br>And then there are all the other fun use cases for the word "core".<br><br>So while there is definitely a relation between "Integrated" and one of<br>the many use cases of the term "Core", I definitely wouldn't go as far<br>as saying *integrated* = *core* at this point.<br><span style='color:#888888'><br><span class=hoenzb>--</span><br><span class=hoenzb>Thierry Carrez (ttx)</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>