<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hi guys,</span></div><div>I knows that question has been treated hundreds of times but i cannot find 1 good answer.</div><div>Moreover, since Havana extend support for cinder and gluster it could be nice to review the question.</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What I currently use on my plateform :</span></div><div><br></div><div>I configured Nexenta to provide NFS and iScsi target :</div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">NFS Instance disk : i mounted a volume on each compute node and configured the NFS on nova.conf. </span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Iscsi for cinder back end : I configured iScsi so when i create a volume it create an iScsi volume and i'm then able to mount in inside instance.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But the problem is that the replication module for nexenta to get a HA storage system is expensive and it's not a distributed file system.</span></div><div><br></div><div><div>My goal : store instances ephemeral storage on a performant, highly available and cheap storage system configured for live migration :D</div><div><br></div><div>To achieve this, I studied read about <span style="font-size: 12pt;">CephFS and glusterFS.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But Ceph is marked has not ready for production and GlusterFS seems to have some concerned about performance.</span></div></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What do you think ? Does anyone have production experiences on GlusterFS or Ceph ?</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Thanks</span></div><div><br></div> </div></body>
</html>