<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 10/11/2011 12:15 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:9E3DC2E6-BFBD-4FA5-8749-323A3BE3A852@rackspace.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
That is one case that would require a major version change where a
URI is still valid. However, changes to the URI are still allowed
across major versions. That causes me to think content-types are
not good enough to handle versioning.<br>
</blockquote>
WADL defines URI structure for a service and media types define data
formats across services. These have different backwards
compatability implications and change independently, so it makes
sense to version them independently. <br>
</body>
</html>