[Openstack] [Tempest] two-node setup verification

Paul S. bronetemkinponosec at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 18:47:00 UTC 2016


Hi again,

I've successfully moved to using centos-release-openstack-mitaka instead of
http://rdo.fedorapeople.org/rdo-release.rpm, but still getting the same
tempest mistakes as before.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Paul S. <bronetemkinponosec at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks, I will try that to see how different repo will affect the tempest
> errors that I get!
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Remo Mattei <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>    - On RHEL:
>>
>>    $ sudo yum install -y https://www.rdoproject.org/repos/rdo-release.rpm
>>    $ sudo yum update -y
>>    $ sudo yum install -y openstack-packstack
>>    $ packstack --allinone
>>
>>    - On CentOS:
>>
>>    $ sudo yum install -y centos-release-openstack-mitaka
>>    $ sudo yum update -y
>>    $ sudo yum install -y openstack-packstack
>>    $ packstack --allinone
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 08:26, Paul S. <bronetemkinponosec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >do you use this on RHEL?
>> No, actually I was using that on the CentOS 7.2, and I saw that repo as a
>> legit one in a lot of openstack guides available on the Internet. So what
>> repo should I use instead of it, and what would be the difference that I
>> should know of?
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Remo Mattei <remo at italy1.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>> do you use this on RHEL? If you do then the rdo repo is ok, if you are
>>> using it on CentOS then the packages have changed.
>>>
>>> My 2 cents.
>>>
>>> Remo
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 07:17, Paul S. <bronetemkinponosec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I've installed the openstack mitaka with packstack on a two-node setup
>>> to get some common knowledge for the openstack. I use tempest to verify the
>>> openstack components, so as for now I've got a couple of errors I hope you
>>> can help me with. I've attached my latest errors log with the errors that I
>>> get as I've managed to fix a lot or to find some workarounds, most of which
>>> were due to the packstack not setting the configuration files properly.
>>>
>>> The errors that disappoint me most have "AssertionError: False is not
>>> true : Public subnets visible" and "MismatchError" traceback messages. As
>>> for the first one, I've found the following link
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1553595
>>>
>>> so as far as I can tell that problem is typical for the neutron
>>> configuration that I use, and the fix will soon be in the stable neutron
>>> packages that I can get from the
>>> http://rdo.fedorapeople.org/rdo-release.rpm repository, so soon I
>>> wouldn't be experiencing these errors.
>>>
>>> As for the 2nd one, I don't have any idea, and I was not able to find
>>> the solution since I've checked if the cinder services are running on the
>>> storage host, and they do indeed have the "active" status, and the basic
>>> functionality like the creation and the attachment of a volume to an
>>> instance.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help here!
>>>
>>> --
>>> sincerely, Paul
>>> <errors.log>_______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list:
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>>> Unsubscribe :
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>>
>>>
>>> !DSPAM:1,57694e8b164681454265375!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> sincerely, Paul
>> !DSPAM:1,57695e67220499680522498!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> sincerely, Paul
>



-- 
sincerely, Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20160712/2dbe1a0d/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list