[Openstack] Migrate instances/tenants between clouds

Shane Johnson sdj at rasmussenequipment.com
Thu Oct 24 21:20:39 UTC 2013


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlowja at yahoo-inc.com>wrote:

>  I agree its not simple (from experience),
>
>  There is a difference though between 'simpler for now' and the 'right
> thing to do',
>
>  If software doesn't support the right thing to do ('upgrade',
> 'dist-upgrade' - or yum equivalent) then the community needs to make that
> work (and stop with new features).
>
>  Otherwise the community is in a whole world of trouble. If openstack is
> to make the life of operations & other people  better and the only way to
> operate it is to build new regions, then something feels backwards in this
> equation.
>
>  IMHO bypassing the problem is not a long-term solution (and is not
> healthy for openstack to even recommend this).
>
>  I don't even think its a short-term solution honestly since building a
> new region costs $$ and downtime. Who wants to do that every 6 months, I
> can surely tell u I don't :)
>
>   From: Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013 1:17 PM
> To: Joshua Harlow <harlowja at yahoo-inc.com>
> Cc: Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch>, Alexander Stellwag <
> openstack at stellwag.net>, "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Migrate instances/tenants between clouds
>
>   I do not even want to try to upgrade my system...
>
> I know that DPKG is awesome and handle system upgrades carefully but,
> sounds more simpler to just build a new Region...
>
>
>  This doesn't sound trivial (like `apt-get update ; apt-get
> dist-upgrade`):
>
>
> http://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/session-videos/presentation/getting-from-grizzly-to-havana-a-devops-upgrade-pattern
>
>  Don't you think!?
>
>
>
> On 24 October 2013 17:48, Joshua Harlow <harlowja at yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> Whatever happened to doing in-place upgrades?
>>
>> Has that been problematic for u, are people just not doing it? If they are
>> avoiding it, why?
>>
>> Shouldn't just going from folsom->havana work, if not, why not; it worries
>> me that this isn't priority #0 if it doesn't work.
>>
>> On 10/24/13 10:51 AM, "Tim Bell" <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Have you tried
>> >
>> >- snapshot
>> >- glance download of the snapshot
>> >- glance upload of the snapshot to new instance
>> >- boot from snapshot
>> >
>> >The process we use at CERN is documented at
>> >
>> http://information-technology.web.cern.ch/book/cern-cloud-infrastructure-u
>> >ser-guide/images/migrating-using-images
>> >
>> >This could be a good technique to document in the standard CERN openstack
>> >user guide.
>> >
>> >BTW, this does increase the storage in your glance server since you'll
>> >loose any commonality between multiple images. So, make sure you've lots
>> >of space on Glance.
>> >
>> >Tim
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Alexander Stellwag [mailto:openstack at stellwag.net]
>> >> Sent: 24 October 2013 16:53
>> >> To: openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> >> Subject: [Openstack] Migrate instances/tenants between clouds
>> >>
>> >> Hi stackers,
>> >>
>> >> we're looking for a tool / script / blueprint to migrate instances or
>> >>even complete tenants between multiple installations of OpenStack
>> >> (possibly running different versions).
>> >>
>> >> I searched around the net but didn't find anything appropriate. Is any
>> >>of you aware of such a tool?
>> >>
>> >> The current use-case is a migration from a folsom/nova-network based
>> >>installation into our new havana/neutron based cloud. It is not
>> >> necessary to migrate instances and volumes online but it should work at
>> >>least semi-automatically to make it usable in large deployments.
>> >>
>> >> Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Alex
>> >> --
>> >> Alexander Stellwag
>> >> Deutsche Telekom AG Products & Innovation Infrastructure Design
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Mailing list:
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> >Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> >Unsubscribe :
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe :
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list:
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org
> Unsubscribe :
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>
>

But doesn't that responsibility lie with the package maintainers for
Openstack in each distro?


-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20131024/43b8c21b/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack mailing list