[Openstack] Storage decision

Julien De Freitas bada.boum at outlook.com
Wed Nov 6 13:56:18 UTC 2013

I'll test this two solutions. Thanks for helping guys !

From: mitch at metauser.net
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:19:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Storage decision
To: macias at shellycloud.com
CC: bada.boum at outlook.com; openstack at lists.openstack.org

I haven't had a chance to test this, but I believe allowing Ceph RBD as ephemerial disk was approved as part of Havana.  Would have required changes to libvirt but the blueprint is here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bring-rbd-support-libvirt-images-type

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Maciej Gałkiewicz <macias at shellycloud.com> wrote:

On 4 November 2013 11:54, Julien De Freitas <bada.boum at outlook.com> wrote:

Hi Maciej,
Tell me if i'm wrong but with block device you have two solutions :1 - Use it with cinder and have to specify Boot From volume when creating a VM

Yes.  2 - Use it directly with meta data storage, but need to create 1 volume for each node

This option does not make sense. 

In any case you loose the ability to live migrate instance.
Right ?

I am using the first option and live migration works fine. regards-- 
Maciej Gałkiewicz
Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin

http://shellycloud.com/, macias at shellycloud.com

KRS: 0000440358 REGON: 101504426


Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Post to     : openstack at lists.openstack.org

Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20131106/0c3b6c89/attachment.html>

More information about the Openstack mailing list