Open Stack

I am using OpenStack for my little lab for a short time too))

Ok, you are right of course, but I meant a some another design when told
about virtualization controller nodes.

It is can be only two dedicated hypetvisor with dedicated share/drbd
between them. This hypervisors will be standalone, and not be part of nova.
Than, maybe pacemaker or another tool can take availability function to
restart VM to alive node when active will die.

Main question here - how worth can be if occurs controller nodes unexpected
power off. In another word, when VM restart it will be in crash consisted
state.
Will some nova services will loose here?
Will RabbiMQ loose some data here? (I am new to RabbitMQ too)

Igor Laskovy
facebook.com/igor.laskovy
Kiev, Ukraine
On Jun 15, 2012 10:54 AM, "Christian Parpart" <trapni at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> well, I said "I might be wrong" because I have no "clear" vision on how
> OpenStack works in
> its deepest detail, however, I would not like to depend on a controller
> node that
> is inside a virtual machine, controlled by compute nodes, that are
> controlled by the controller
> node. This sounds quite like a chicken-and-egg problem.
>
> However, at the time of this writing, I think you'll have to have a
> working nova-scheduler process,
> which is responsible on deciding on which compute node to spawn your VM
> (what else?),
> and think about what you do when this (or all your controller-)VMs
> terribly die,
> and you want to rebuild it, how do you plan to do this when your
> controller node is out-of-service?
>
> I in my case have put the controller services onto two compute nodes, and
> use Pacemaker
> to switch between them, in case one node goes down, the other can take
> over (via shared service-IP).
>
> Again, these are my thoughts, and I am using OpenStack for just about a
> month now :-)
> But I hope this helps a bit...
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Parpart.
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Igor Laskovy <igor.laskovy at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Why? Can you please clarify.
>>
>> Igor Laskovy
>> facebook.com/igor.laskovy
>> Kiev, Ukraine
>> On Jun 15, 2012 1:55 AM, "Christian Parpart" <trapni at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think putting the controller node completely into a VM is a good
>>> advice,
>>> at least when speaking of nova-scheduler and nova-api (if central).
>>>
>>> I may be wrong, and if so, please correct me.
>>>
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Igor Laskovy <igor.laskovy at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, have any updates there?
>>>> Can anybody clarify what happens if controller nodes just going hard
>>>> shutdown?
>>>>
>>>> I thinking about solution with two hypervisors and putting controller
>>>> node in VM shared storage, which can be relaunched when active
>>>> hypervisor will die.
>>>> Any ideas, advise?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Garbutt <John.Garbutt at citrix.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Sure, I get your point.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think Florian is working on some docs to help on that.
>>>> >
>>>> > Not sure how much has been done already.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> >
>>>> > John
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > From: Christian Parpart [mailto:trapni at gmail.com]
>>>> > Sent: 12 June 2012 13:47
>>>> > To: John Garbutt
>>>> > Cc: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Nova Controller HA issues
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Hey, ya I also found this page, but didn't find it yet that helpful,
>>>> it
>>>> > rather much sounds like a theoretical paper on
>>>> >
>>>> > how they implemented it rather then telling me on how to actually
>>>> make it
>>>> > happen (from the sysop point of view :-)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I hoped that someone had to face this already, since I really find it
>>>> very
>>>> > unintuitive to realize, or need to wait until
>>>> >
>>>> > I get more time to investigate dedicated. :-)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Christian.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:52 PM, John Garbutt <
>>>> John.Garbutt at citrix.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > I thought Rabbit had a built in HA solution these days:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > From: openstack-operators-bounces at lists.openstack.org
>>>> > [mailto:openstack-operators-bounces at lists.openstack.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> > Christian Parpart
>>>> > Sent: 12 June 2012 09:59
>>>> > To: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>> > Subject: [Openstack-operators] Nova Controller HA issues
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > after spending the whole evening in making our cloud controller node
>>>> highly
>>>> > available
>>>> >
>>>> > using Corosync/Pacemaker, at which I am really proud about it, I am
>>>> having
>>>> > just a few
>>>> >
>>>> > problems left, and the one that freaks me out the most is
>>>> rabbitmq-server.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > That beast I just seem to find no good documenation on how to set
>>>> > rabbitmq-server up
>>>> >
>>>> > properly for HA'ing.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Does anyone have ever tried to set a nova controller (including
>>>> rabbitmq
>>>> > dependency) up for HAing?
>>>> >
>>>> > If so, I'd be pleased to share experiences, especially to the latter
>>>> part.
>>>> > :-)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > Christian Parpart
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Openstack-operators mailing list
>>>> > Openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>> >
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Igor Laskovy
>>>> Kiev, Ukraine
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120615/d0c0dba9/attachment.html>