Open Stack

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
> > <vishvananda at gmail.com <mailto:vishvananda at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     This is up to dan, I suppose, but the rootwrap stuff seems like
> >     something worth granting a ffe to…
> >
> >
> > I wasn't going to mention it, as the urgency of a nearby deadline can be
> > helpful :)
> >
> > But yes, I'd grant an ffe to something this important, especially
> > because it applies across all uses of quantum.
>
> On one hand it's a change that impacts almost all use cases, so
> definitely not something that is simple or self-contained. On the other,
> it's quite easy to trace back issues to this. In summary, if it's the
> only exception in Quantum, it's not really a problem :)
>
> [warning: a trick is included in the last paragraph]
>

ttx, I caught it.... I'm on to your project management jedi mind tricks :)

jrd, my feeling is that we'd need a patch for this under review this week
to understand the magnitude of the changes if we want to consider if for a
feature-freeze exception.  Thanks.

dan


>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20120814/0a5df50b/attachment.html>