On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, Monsyne Dragon <mdragon at RACKSPACE.COM> wrote: > Even better, what would it take to try using Alembic? > (http://alembic.readthedocs.org/en/latest/front.html#project-homepage) > > It's a big improvement over sqlalchemy. Amongst other things, > migrations are not numbered, they are linked by dependancy, and run in > topological-sort order. That there eliminates alot of "my migration > number got taken... again..." problems. I've mentioned in on the list before, but here's a partial switch over to alembic: https://github.com/jerdfelt/nova/tree/alembic However, it's orthogonal to merging migrations. It wouldn't be any better or worse in that regard. JE