[Openstack] Creating a forum

Lorin Hochstein lorin at isi.edu
Sun May 8 18:15:17 UTC 2011


All:

Note that the proposed OpenStack Stack Exchange site was rejected as being too close to the existing Server Fault site: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/31788/openstack

Lorin
--
Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
USC Information Sciences Institute
703.812.3710
http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin

On May 8, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Everett Toews wrote:

> Hi Jordan,
> 
> Thanks a lot for sharing that process with me. I appreciate it.
> 
> I've made my proposal at http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/QuestionAndAnswerSoftware
> 
> Everett
> 
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Jordan Rinke <jordan at openstack.org> wrote:
> The replacement of Launchpad Questions hasn't been fully discussed. If people want OSQnA to replace that functionality it needs to be proposed for the next PPB meeting ( http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/ ) and discussed on list (Although to me it seems fairly evident that it is desired). AFAIK that is the course of action needed to get that either implemented as a replacement or as an add-on. Whatever the questions software is the forums will maintain a sticky pointing to it (or both etc.).
> 
> (I just learned how all that workd properly ;)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Everett Toews" <everett.toews at cybera.ca>
> Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2011 10:06pm
> To: "Jordan Rinke" <jordan at openstack.org>
> Cc: "Chad Keck" <chad at chadkeck.com>, "Stephen Spector" <stephen.spector at openstack.org>, openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Creating a forum
> 
> Okay...so I at least have to ask. Where exactly does that leave the
> evaluation and potential use of QnA software? Will there be a
> qa.openstack.org?
> 
> The meeting logs for the PPB (
> http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/PPB/PPBMeetingLogs) haven't been posted
> yet so it isn't clear.
> 
> I would be willing to host a OSQA site for evaluation purposes.
> 
> One thing to keep in mind for after the evaluation process. The users for
> the OpenStack.org wiki and any forum/QnA software should be synced so people
> don't need 3 username/passwords when trying to get help.
> 
> I confess it's tempting to just let this drop but there are enough people on
> the ML who want this warrant pursuing it.
> 
> Everett
> 
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Jordan Rinke <jordan at openstack.org> wrote:
> 
> > Forums (forums.openstack.org) have just been approved by the PPB.
> > Delegation on working with the community to get consensus on selecting a
> > software for them is to Chad Keck, Myself and Stephen Spector.
> >
> > I should note that based on what I read it appears Forums AND Questions
> > seem to be the answer to the forums debate with a sticky on the forums
> > pointing to whatever the QA software is to funnel specific questions to a
> > questions facility but also to allow general discussion on the forums. Right
> > now, I personally am only focusing on the forums/discussion portion since
> > that was the only portion specifically voted on that I am aware of.
> >
> > If you have a suggestion for forum software please provide it and I will
> > get demos of every one recommended up and we can put the software to a vote
> > for the official forums.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Chad Keck" <chad at chadkeck.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2011 3:59pm
> > To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack] Creating a forum
> >
> > I was about to say ;)
> >
> > My unofficial forums aren't THAT ugly!
> >
> > -- Chad
> >
> > On May 5, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >
> > > Oh and I use "ugly" in quotation marks to indicate that's completely
> > subjective. No judgment from me! I only believe data. :) I didn't want to
> > use inflammatory word choices here, sorry.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org> wrote:
> > > We're still so small it's very reasonable for all members of the
> > community to want to have some say here. Plus there's a lotta overlap in
> > these two groups, dev and SA. :)
> > >
> > > - we're highly interested in defending OpenStack as a brand and as such,
> > don't see value in "ugly" unofficial forums
> > > - we want to participate but only if it's a tool we like and feel we've
> > given input into
> > > - we don't want to further dilute the resources we have with yet another
> > login-based website
> > > - we somehow tied it into the Launchpad/Github debate as Launchpad
> > Answers is one solution to the types of problems that a "forum" solves
> > >
> > > I think a clearer restatement of the end-goals of forums would be
> > helpful. Here are some ideas. Please offer your input as well.
> > >
> > > 1. Efficiency and reduce confusion: Offer one place to ask and answer
> > questions.
> > > 2. Efficiency and reduce confusion: Decrease user-question-type traffic
> > on #openstack IRC.
> > > 3. Reciprocity: Offer a place to help others expecting help in return.
> > > 4. Reputation: Offer a method for proving your knowledge of OpenStack.
> > > 5. Efficiency and reduce confusion: Eliminate the scattering of places
> > where you can ask and answer questions now: docs.openstack.org comments,
> > Launchpad Answers, and IRC.
> > >
> > > Adding a forum without eliminating at least one other of these options
> > does not seem efficient without proving the gains you expect to see. We have
> > to keep monitoring all sites including Twitter for questions, yet Twitter in
> > itself does not provide a tool for a community support site.
> > >
> > > Since docs provide support and also an opportunity for Q&A I'm pretty
> > vested in the solution as well. I'd prefer we find a way to integrate with a
> > site that could become a community support site, not just a forum. I think
> > that distinction is at the heart of this discussion.
> > >
> > > Does that help?
> > > Anne
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jordan Rinke <jordan at openstack.org>
> > wrote:
> > > I don't see why developers are weighing in so heavily on something
> > specifically for the user community? Many of you have specifically said you
> > wouldn't visit a forum so why do you care so much about what software it
> > uses, or if it even exists?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Chad Keck" <chad at chadkeck.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2011 12:55pm
> > > To: openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > > Subject: Re: [Openstack] Creating a forum
> > >
> > > What does it matter what the forum looks like? If you are implying that
> > forums are largely unpopular today because of StackOverflow you would be
> > wrong. Of course StackOverflow is popular, for some, and it works great for
> > a specific type of community.
> > >
> > > Maybe someone should clearly articulate what problem we are trying to
> > solve here. If it's direct Q&A then a StackOverflow style site is probably
> > better, if its a place for conversation, exchange of ideas or asking
> > indirect questions I think traditional forums are better, IMHO.
> > >
> > > -- Chad
> > >
> > > On May 5, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> > >
> > > > On May 4, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Chad Keck wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> How about this...
> > > >>
> > > >> www.stackertalk.com
> > > >>
> > > >> Since I'm not a developer I'd like to contribute in some form or
> > another :) There is a lot more refinement that needs to go into the site but
> > I'm happy to run this forum. If anyone would like to help
> > moderate/administer please let me know.
> > > >
> > > >       -1
> > > >
> > > >       This looks like every other run-of-the-mill forum circa 1999. The
> > reason StackOverflow is so popular is largely a reaction to fora like this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Ed Leafe
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
> > > > embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use
> > of the
> > > > individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless
> > otherwise
> > > > expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of
> > Rackspace.
> > > > Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is
> > prohibited.
> > > > If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately
> > by e-mail
> > > > at abuse at rackspace.com, and delete the original message.
> > > > Your cooperation is appreciated.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20110508/2b29e6aa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3910 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/attachments/20110508/2b29e6aa/attachment.bin>


More information about the Openstack mailing list