Open Stack

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Dan Prince <dan.prince at rackspace.com> wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Appoligies for the late blueprint submission. I guess I like using Blueprints for missing features so that I can setup the dependencies in launchpad. On this specific issue I just wanted some community comments and communication on the notes I had in etherpad. Although my initial email was poorly worded I did get a couple useful comments.

No worries, Dan.

> Bugs vs. Blueprints is sort of a gray area. When a larger blue print is accepted (like the Openstack 1.1 API) should we file component features as bugs or blueprints?
>
> In my case I could have easily considered this a bug as well since we should already support the v1.0 API right?

Ya, probably should have been a bug, but it's OK. I agree there is
some confusion over bugs vs. blueprints...

-jay