2011/8/31 Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda at gmail.com>: >> Can you elaborate on this? Both methods resize the disk, how does the >> second method impose more limitations than the first? > In the first case it is perfectly reasonable to have a whole disk image that is of a decent size for the base image, so you can get by just fine with the secondary attached disk if the resize does nothing. So to me that is a lot more flexible. Ah, gotcha. Makes sense. -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/