<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""> </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Shamail <<a href="mailto:itzshamail@gmail.com" class="">itzshamail@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div class=""></div><div class="">Hi Lauren,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Do we still plan to have a session on the feedback tool now that the plans have changed and it will be live in Tokyo? Could we re-purpose that session to discuss possible options to re-explore talk selections or even use one of the extra slots left over from ops-track? </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This topic has come up often and has generated a lot of discussion via email as well. It would be great if we could create a work-steam with a F2F kick-off in Tokyo... </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Just throwing the proposal out there, I would gladly attend if there was a working session on the agenda.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Potential Topics:</div><div class="">Track Chair Composition</div><div class="">Vote Eligibility</div><div class="">Checks/Balances</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Shamail </div><div class=""><br class="">On Oct 14, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Duncan Thomas <<a href="mailto:duncan.thomas@gmail.com" class="">duncan.thomas@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">I think limiting votes only to people who submit talks would lead to people/companies submitting poor talks just to get a vote (gaming the system).<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Voting on a random subset of the talks, rather than all seems like a great idea though - I suspect most people flick through for the few talks they know they're interested in, maybe vote for some more from their company, then stop, because there are so many. Giving each voter a choice of half a dozen or a dozen talks to vote on (or rank) could lead to much broader participation.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 October 2015 at 22:25, Florian Haas <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:florian.haas@hastexo.com" target="_blank" class="">florian.haas@hastexo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello everyone,<br class="">
<br class="">
just coming back to the discussion from a couple of months ago, on the<br class="">
merit of the Summit proposal voting process. There's an interesting<br class="">
contribution to the discussion from an unexpected field (astronomy).<br class="">
I've collected a few links here:<br class="">
<br class="">
<a href="https://plus.google.com/+FlorianHaas/posts/MsswaBHramG" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://plus.google.com/+FlorianHaas/posts/MsswaBHramG</a><br class="">
<br class="">
Maybe an idea worth considering?<br class="">
<br class="">
Cheers,<br class="">
Florian<br class="">
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Openstack-track-chairs mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org" class="">Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org</a><br class="">
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div><br class=""><br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div>-- <br class=""><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">-- <br class="">Duncan Thomas</div></div></div>
</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class=""><span class="">Openstack-track-chairs mailing list</span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="mailto:Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org" class="">Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org</a></span><br class=""><span class=""><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs" class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs</a></span><br class=""></div></blockquote></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">Openstack-track-chairs mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org" class="">Openstack-track-chairs@lists.openstack.org</a><br class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>