From jimmy at tipit.net Thu Feb 8 19:20:02 2018
From: jimmy at tipit.net (Jimmy Mcarthur)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 13:20:02 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Programming Committee Communications
Message-ID: <5A7CA2E2.1040306@tipit.net>
Hi all!
Thank you for participating as a member of a Vancouver Summit
Programming Committee. Just a heads up that the Vancouver Summit
CFP closes *TODAY at
11:59pm Pacific Time (February 9 at 6:59am UTC).*
We would love for you to help promote this final deadline to your
respective audiences. Along those lines, we put some sample tweets
together that you can send out to your various social media accounts.
Sample text for each track can be found at the bottom of this etherpad
.
If you have any questions, please respond on this mailing list or
contact us directly at speakersupport at openstack.org. We will be
following up this week with next steps.
Cheers,
Jimmy & Kendall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From kendall at openstack.org Mon Feb 12 16:17:22 2018
From: kendall at openstack.org (Kendall Waters)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:17:22 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session
Selection Process
Message-ID: <1D5120E6-BB94-4BB0-A95C-99DCFB3B74F2@openstack.org>
Hi everyone,
It’s time for Part One of the Programming Committee process! Before you begin, please take the time to watch this tutorial video .
You have between now and this Sunday, February 18 at 11:59pm PT (February 19 at 7:59 UTC) to complete this part. See the timeline below for reference.
During this time we ask you to:
Review the submissions within your specific track and identify any that need to be moved into another track category by clicking the “Suggest Category Change” button. View the full list of tracks here .
Flag any talks that are obvious test submissions and need to be removed. Note this by making a comment and sending an email to speakersupport at openstack.org with a link to the presentation.
Include comments on any sessions that you want to flag for more discussion later during the selection process. *ONLY* track chairs will be able to view your comments. Speakers and submitters cannot see your comments.
Please watch this tutorial video to learn how to use the Track Chair tool.
After you’ve watched the video you may access the Programming Committee tool: www.openstack.org/track-chairs/
Log in with your email address and the password that you've set for the OpenStack website. If you need to reset your password, you can do that here . If you have any login issues please contact speakersupport at openstack.org .
As a reminder, the submission review process has two parts:
Part One: February 12 - 18
Reviewing/moving session submissions before voting opens (2-4 hours)
Part Two: February 26 - March 12
Final track sessions decisions (8 hours)
Contacting your fellow Programming Committee members:
The email addresses and track names for all track chairs are listed here: https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/directory
Full Timeline
February 12-18: Programming Committees review submissions and potentially move sessions to other tracks if they are a better fit BEFORE community voting begins
February 19 - 22: Session voting open to the community
February 26 - March 12: Programming Committees receive and review proposals and discuss choices
March 12: Programming Committees submit final session selections via administrative tool
March 16: Foundation staff notifies all submitters whether or not their session was accepted into the final Summit agenda
March 16: Breakout session agenda published
As a reminder, please do not notify speakers that they have been accepted ahead of the public announcement.
We’ll be in touch the week of February 26th with another tutorial video and detailed steps on Part Two when you will use the track chair administrative tool to make your individual and team selections.
Cheers,
Kendall & Jimmy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From amrith.kumar at gmail.com Tue Feb 13 21:49:50 2018
From: amrith.kumar at gmail.com (Amrith Kumar)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:49:50 -0500
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
Message-ID:
I submitted track change requests for
this talk , and this
talk
to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't "Public cloud
specific". They are certainly more appropriate in Public cloud than in
Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the question "How are these Telecom
& NFV specific".
How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
Private & Hybrid Cloud
Public Cloud
Container Infrastructure
Edge Computing
OpenDev CI/CD
HPC/GPU/AI
Telecom & NFV, and
Open Source Community
it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
Thanks,
-amrith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Feb 13 22:08:36 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:08:36 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <5A8361E4.2000104@openstack.org>
I'm removing everyone cc'd and just keeping this topic on the Track
Chairs list. This is a great example of the Track Chairs talking out
where tracks should ultimately land.
There will always be a bit of overlap amongst the tracks when it comes
to particular abstracts. Your job as track chairs is to figure out the
best fit for a particular track. Or perhaps it's not a good fit for
any. If you're really stuck and can't make a decision, someone from
Foundation staff can jump in, but ideally these decisions will be made
by the community.
Please let me know if you all need further guidance :)
Thanks!
Jimmy
Amrith Kumar wrote:
> I submitted track change requests for
>
> this talk , and
> this talk
>
> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>
> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't "Public
> cloud specific". They are certainly more appropriate in Public cloud
> than in Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the question "How are
> these Telecom & NFV specific".
>
> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
>
> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
>
> Private & Hybrid Cloud
> Public Cloud
> Container Infrastructure
> Edge Computing
> OpenDev CI/CD
> HPC/GPU/AI
> Telecom & NFV, and
> Open Source Community
>
> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -amrith
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From yih.leong.sun at intel.com Tue Feb 13 22:10:48 2018
From: yih.leong.sun at intel.com (Sun, Yih Leong)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:10:48 +0000
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session
Selection Process
Message-ID:
Hi Kendall/Jimmy,
Would there be a “Forum” for Working Group/SIG sessions and BoF?
Thanks!
Leong.
From: Kendall Waters [mailto:kendall at openstack.org]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:17 AM
To: openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session Selection Process
Hi everyone,
It’s time for Part One of the Programming Committee process! Before you begin, please take the time to watch this tutorial video.
You have between now and this Sunday, February 18 at 11:59pm PT (February 19 at 7:59 UTC) to complete this part. See the timeline below for reference.
During this time we ask you to:
1. Review the submissions within your specific track and identify any that need to be moved into another track category by clicking the “Suggest Category Change” button. View the full list of tracks here.
1. Flag any talks that are obvious test submissions and need to be removed. Note this by making a comment and sending an email to speakersupport at openstack.org with a link to the presentation.
1. Include comments on any sessions that you want to flag for more discussion later during the selection process. *ONLY* track chairs will be able to view your comments. Speakers and submitters cannot see your comments.
Please watch this tutorial video to learn how to use the Track Chair tool.
After you’ve watched the video you may access the Programming Committee tool: www.openstack.org/track-chairs/
Log in with your email address and the password that you've set for the OpenStack website. If you need to reset your password, you can do that here. If you have any login issues please contact speakersupport at openstack.org.
As a reminder, the submission review process has two parts:
Part One: February 12 - 18
Reviewing/moving session submissions before voting opens (2-4 hours)
Part Two: February 26 - March 12
Final track sessions decisions (8 hours)
Contacting your fellow Programming Committee members:
The email addresses and track names for all track chairs are listed here: https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/directory
Full Timeline
February 12-18: Programming Committees review submissions and potentially move sessions to other tracks if they are a better fit BEFORE community voting begins
February 19 - 22: Session voting open to the community
February 26 - March 12: Programming Committees receive and review proposals and discuss choices
March 12: Programming Committees submit final session selections via administrative tool
March 16: Foundation staff notifies all submitters whether or not their session was accepted into the final Summit agenda
March 16: Breakout session agenda published
As a reminder, please do not notify speakers that they have been accepted ahead of the public announcement.
We’ll be in touch the week of February 26th with another tutorial video and detailed steps on Part Two when you will use the track chair administrative tool to make your individual and team selections.
Cheers,
Kendall & Jimmy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Feb 13 22:16:14 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:16:14 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session
Selection Process
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <5A8363AE.6010101@openstack.org>
Hi Leong,
We do solicit Working Group/SIG and BoF sessions separate from the CFP.
This should occur sometime closer to the Summit.
Thanks!
Jimmy
Sun, Yih Leong wrote:
>
> Hi Kendall/Jimmy,
>
> Would there be a “Forum” for Working Group/SIG sessions and BoF?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Leong.
>
> *From:*Kendall Waters [mailto:kendall at openstack.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 8:17 AM
> *To:* openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session
> Selection Process
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> It’s time for Part One of the Programming Committee process! Before
> you begin, please take the time to watch this tutorial video
> .
>
> You have between now and this Sunday, February 18 at 11:59pm PT
> (February 19 at 7:59 UTC) to complete this part. See the timeline
> below for reference.
>
> During this time we ask you to:
>
> 1. Review the submissions within your specific track and identify any
> that need to be moved into another track category by clicking the
> “Suggest Category Change” button. View the full list of tracks
> here
> .
>
> 2. Flag any talks that are obvious test submissions and need to be
> removed. Note this by making a comment and sending an email to
> speakersupport at openstack.org
> with a link to the presentation.
>
> 3. Include comments on any sessions that you want to flag for more
> discussion later during the selection process. *ONLY* track chairs
> will be able to view your comments. Speakers and submitters cannot
> see your comments.
>
> Please watch this tutorial video
> to learn how to use the
> Track Chair tool.
>
> After you’ve watched the video you may access the Programming
> Committee tool:www.openstack.org/track-chairs/
>
>
> Log in with your email address and the password that you've set for
> the OpenStack website. If you need to reset your password, you can do
> thathere . If you
> have any login issues please contact speakersupport at openstack.org
> .
>
> *As a reminder, the submission review process has two parts:*
>
> Part One: February 12 - 18
>
> Reviewing/moving session submissions before voting opens (2-4 hours)
>
> Part Two: February 26 - March 12
>
> Final track sessions decisions (8 hours)
>
> *Contacting your fellow Programming Committee members:*
>
> The email addresses and track names for all track chairs are listed
> here:https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/directory
>
> *Full Timeline*
>
> February 12-18: Programming Committees review submissions and
> potentially move sessions to other tracks if they are a better fit
> BEFORE community voting begins
>
> February 19 - 22: Session voting open to the community
>
> February 26 - March 12: Programming Committees receive and review
> proposals and discuss choices
>
> March 12: Programming Committees submit final session selections via
> administrative tool
>
> March 16: Foundation staff notifies all submitters whether or not
> their session was accepted into the final Summit agenda
>
> March 16: Breakout session agenda published
>
> As a reminder, please *do not notify speakers* that they have been
> accepted ahead of the public announcement.
>
> We’ll be in touch the week of February 26th with another tutorial
> video and detailed steps on Part Two when you will use the track chair
> administrative tool to make your individual and team selections.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kendall & Jimmy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From yih.leong.sun at intel.com Tue Feb 13 22:25:48 2018
From: yih.leong.sun at intel.com (Sun, Yih Leong)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:25:48 +0000
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session
Selection Process
In-Reply-To: <5A8363AE.6010101@openstack.org>
References:
<5A8363AE.6010101@openstack.org>
Message-ID:
There are two SIG/BoF related proposals, which I think should be separated from this CFP.
https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20654
https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20655
I have emailed the speakers for more info.
From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:jimmy at openstack.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 2:16 PM
To: openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
Cc: Kendall Waters ; Sun, Yih Leong
Subject: Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session Selection Process
Hi Leong,
We do solicit Working Group/SIG and BoF sessions separate from the CFP. This should occur sometime closer to the Summit.
Thanks!
Jimmy
Sun, Yih Leong wrote:
Hi Kendall/Jimmy,
Would there be a “Forum” for Working Group/SIG sessions and BoF?
Thanks!
Leong.
From: Kendall Waters [mailto:kendall at openstack.org]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:17 AM
To: openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Part One: Vancouver Summit Session Selection Process
Hi everyone,
It’s time for Part One of the Programming Committee process! Before you begin, please take the time to watch this tutorial video.
You have between now and this Sunday, February 18 at 11:59pm PT (February 19 at 7:59 UTC) to complete this part. See the timeline below for reference.
During this time we ask you to:
1. Review the submissions within your specific track and identify any that need to be moved into another track category by clicking the “Suggest Category Change” button. View the full list of tracks here.
2. Flag any talks that are obvious test submissions and need to be removed. Note this by making a comment and sending an email to speakersupport at openstack.org with a link to the presentation.
3. Include comments on any sessions that you want to flag for more discussion later during the selection process. *ONLY* track chairs will be able to view your comments. Speakers and submitters cannot see your comments.
Please watch this tutorial video to learn how to use the Track Chair tool.
After you’ve watched the video you may access the Programming Committee tool: www.openstack.org/track-chairs/
Log in with your email address and the password that you've set for the OpenStack website. If you need to reset your password, you can do that here. If you have any login issues please contact speakersupport at openstack.org.
As a reminder, the submission review process has two parts:
Part One: February 12 - 18
Reviewing/moving session submissions before voting opens (2-4 hours)
Part Two: February 26 - March 12
Final track sessions decisions (8 hours)
Contacting your fellow Programming Committee members:
The email addresses and track names for all track chairs are listed here: https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/directory
Full Timeline
February 12-18: Programming Committees review submissions and potentially move sessions to other tracks if they are a better fit BEFORE community voting begins
February 19 - 22: Session voting open to the community
February 26 - March 12: Programming Committees receive and review proposals and discuss choices
March 12: Programming Committees submit final session selections via administrative tool
March 16: Foundation staff notifies all submitters whether or not their session was accepted into the final Summit agenda
March 16: Breakout session agenda published
As a reminder, please do not notify speakers that they have been accepted ahead of the public announcement.
We’ll be in touch the week of February 26th with another tutorial video and detailed steps on Part Two when you will use the track chair administrative tool to make your individual and team selections.
Cheers,
Kendall & Jimmy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jkreger at gmail.com Tue Feb 13 22:28:04 2018
From: jkreger at gmail.com (Julia Kreger)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:28:04 -0800
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Just my $.01 opinion.
The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind. The second
seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud category, however
that category also has many items at present... so it might also make sense
to leave it in Telecom & NFV even though I think the intersection between
the proposed topic and the track is not the best alignment.
I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the abstracts in
Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how many could fit into a
Cloud Security or Incident Response category, which could actually lead to
some interesting community overlaps if fostered over time.
-Julia
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar
wrote:
> I submitted track change requests for
>
> this talk , and this
> talk
>
> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>
> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't "Public cloud
> specific". They are certainly more appropriate in Public cloud than in
> Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the question "How are these Telecom
> & NFV specific".
>
> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
>
> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
>
> Private & Hybrid Cloud
> Public Cloud
> Container Infrastructure
> Edge Computing
> OpenDev CI/CD
> HPC/GPU/AI
> Telecom & NFV, and
> Open Source Community
>
> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -amrith
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jkreger at gmail.com Tue Feb 13 22:33:50 2018
From: jkreger at gmail.com (Julia Kreger)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 14:33:50 -0800
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Fwd: Private & Hybrid Track
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
Jimmy requested that I send this over to the track chair list. I sent this
earlier today upon finishing up sifting through the current state of the
Private & Hybrid queue. The fun of multiple email addresses! :)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julia Kreger
Date: Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM
Subject: Private & Hybrid Track
To: huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net, moreira.belmiro at gmail.com,
ushnishtha at hotmail.com, jimmy at tipit.net
Greetings everyone!
I wanted to let you all know that I've managed to sift through our
huge list of proposed talks. I proposed track changes for a couple
that were definitely better fits in other tracks to the other tracks,
and It looks like a couple are still pending.
I was on the fence on a few of them, and have commented as such where
appropriate. If anyone agrees, we should likely consider requesting a
move of the talk to another track.
There is one submission that is concerning,
https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20951?category=210 I
sent an email to the submitter in an attempt to obtain clarification,
but I've not yet heard back.
One observation that I had from reviewing the proposals was that there
was a strong theme of security and compliance in about 15-20% of the
talks. It might be only because of recent processor vulnerabilities,
but it may be worth recommending that for the fall summit, a security
and compliance track is created.
-Julia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Feb 13 22:36:27 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:36:27 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Fwd: Private & Hybrid Track
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <5A83686B.70105@openstack.org>
Thanks Julia! I appreciate you sending it. This is a great example of
the type of discussion we would love to see within the Track Chairs ML.
It's very valuable for us from the Foundation POV to see these types of
discussions b/c it helps us with programming future summits.
Further, it's a great example of really good Track Chair
review/communication. For those of you that might be new to the process,
Julia nails it :)
Cheers,
Jimmy
Julia Kreger wrote:
>
> Jimmy requested that I send this over to the track chair list. I sent
> this earlier today upon finishing up sifting through the current state
> of the Private & Hybrid queue. The fun of multiple email addresses! :)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Julia Kreger >
> Date: Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM
> Subject: Private & Hybrid Track
> To: huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net ,
> moreira.belmiro at gmail.com ,
> ushnishtha at hotmail.com ,
> jimmy at tipit.net
>
>
> Greetings everyone!
>
> I wanted to let you all know that I've managed to sift through our
> huge list of proposed talks. I proposed track changes for a couple
> that were definitely better fits in other tracks to the other tracks,
> and It looks like a couple are still pending.
>
> I was on the fence on a few of them, and have commented as such where
> appropriate. If anyone agrees, we should likely consider requesting a
> move of the talk to another track.
>
> There is one submission that is concerning,
> https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20951?category=210
> I
> sent an email to the submitter in an attempt to obtain clarification,
> but I've not yet heard back.
>
> One observation that I had from reviewing the proposals was that there
> was a strong theme of security and compliance in about 15-20% of the
> talks. It might be only because of recent processor vulnerabilities,
> but it may be worth recommending that for the fall summit, a security
> and compliance track is created.
>
> -Julia
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From gkevorki at cisco.com Tue Feb 13 22:42:45 2018
From: gkevorki at cisco.com (Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki))
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:42:45 +0000
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
You know you can count on me for my $.02...
Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in the tracks (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the talks fall into one of eight?
#JustAsking
[ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png]
Gary Kevorkian
EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
gkevorki at cisco.com
Tel: +3237912058
[ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png]
[ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png] [ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png] [ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png]
Cisco Systems, Inc.
United States
Cisco.com
[ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]
Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Please click here for Company Registration Information.
From: Julia Kreger
Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
To: Amrith Kumar
Cc: "speakersupport at openstack.org" , "Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
Subject: Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
Just my $.01 opinion.
The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind. The second seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud category, however that category also has many items at present... so it might also make sense to leave it in Telecom & NFV even though I think the intersection between the proposed topic and the track is not the best alignment.
I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the abstracts in Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how many could fit into a Cloud Security or Incident Response category, which could actually lead to some interesting community overlaps if fostered over time.
-Julia
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar > wrote:
I submitted track change requests for
this talk, and this talk
to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't "Public cloud specific". They are certainly more appropriate in Public cloud than in Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the question "How are these Telecom & NFV specific".
How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
Private & Hybrid Cloud
Public Cloud
Container Infrastructure
Edge Computing
OpenDev CI/CD
HPC/GPU/AI
Telecom & NFV, and
Open Source Community
it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
Thanks,
-amrith
_______________________________________________
Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25276 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 521 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3510 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3405 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3506 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 134 bytes
Desc: image006.gif
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Feb 13 22:46:05 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:46:05 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To: <9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
References:
<9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
Removing Speaker Support and all the cc's since you're all subscribe to
the Track Chair list :)
To answer Gary's question... We actually had a pretty even distribution
of submissions this go round. Obviously Private Cloud and Public Cloud
have a higher number of submissions, but based on what we've seen, it
feels like we're getting closer to a good set of tracks.
That said, this is exactly the type of feedback we're looking for. So
please let us know if you feel we could be adding or subtracting tracks
as the process goes on.
Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>
> You know you can count on me for my $.02...
>
> Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in the
> tracks (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the talks fall
> into one of eight?
>
> #JustAsking
>
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png
>
>
>
>
>
> Gary Kevorkian
>
> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>
> gkevorki at cisco.com
>
> Tel: +3237912058
>
>
>
>
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png
>
>
>
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png
>
>
>
>
>
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
> United States
>
> Cisco.com
>
>
> ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif
>
>
>
>
> Think before you print.
>
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
> sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
> message.
>
> Please click here
> for
> Company Registration Information.
>
>
>
> *From: *Julia Kreger
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
> *To: *Amrith Kumar
> *Cc: *"speakersupport at openstack.org" ,
> "Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
>
> Just my $.01 opinion.
>
> The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind. The
> second seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud category,
> however that category also has many items at present... so it might
> also make sense to leave it in Telecom & NFV even though I think the
> intersection between the proposed topic and the track is not the best
> alignment.
>
> I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the abstracts
> in Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how many could fit
> into a Cloud Security or Incident Response category, which could
> actually lead to some interesting community overlaps if fostered over
> time.
>
> -Julia
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar > wrote:
>
> I submitted track change requests for
>
> this talk ,
> and this talk
>
> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>
> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't
> "Public cloud specific". They are certainly more appropriate in
> Public cloud than in Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the
> question "How are these Telecom & NFV specific".
>
> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
>
> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
>
> Private & Hybrid Cloud
>
> Public Cloud
>
> Container Infrastructure
>
> Edge Computing
>
> OpenDev CI/CD
>
> HPC/GPU/AI
>
> Telecom & NFV, and
>
> Open Source Community
>
> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -amrith
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 578 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 613 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 751 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Tue Feb 13 22:51:37 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:51:37 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Workshops
Message-ID: <5A836BF9.4010907@openstack.org>
Speaking of things that we could fix for next year.... This Summit we
had workshops submit under normal tracks, but simply specify that they
were a workshop under "Presentation Type" dropdown in the submission
form. Unfortunately, this caused a bit of confusion. As a result, we'll
be pulling these out of the CFP review and sending them to the
Presentation Committee Chairs separately with a max number they can
choose per Track.
The idea is to make sure we have enough workshops to fill the workshop
space, and avoid having them take up one of your normal presentation
slots in the schedule.
So... stand by for further communication from myself or Kendall on this.
Thanks!
Jimmy
From tobias at citynetwork.se Wed Feb 14 08:47:49 2018
From: tobias at citynetwork.se (Tobias Rydberg)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:47:49 +0100
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To: <5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
References:
<9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
<5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <2b32f32c-669f-e4b6-22f3-9d6a4eb94975@citynetwork.se>
Good discussions! Agree that it is sometimes unclear and hard to find a
suitable track for sessions - interesting sessions for that matter - but
can become less interesting in the wrong track due to the fact that it
isn't 100 % relevant.
Have a couple of sessions that are very generic around specific
OpenStack projects - is that a per definition private, hybrid or public
cloud? Is it OpenSource community? How would you folks categorize a
session like that?
I will make a choice here, but interesting to hear what the rest of you
thinks!
Cheers,
Tobias
On 2018-02-13 23:46, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Removing Speaker Support and all the cc's since you're all subscribe
> to the Track Chair list :)
>
> To answer Gary's question... We actually had a pretty even
> distribution of submissions this go round. Obviously Private Cloud and
> Public Cloud have a higher number of submissions, but based on what
> we've seen, it feels like we're getting closer to a good set of tracks.
>
> That said, this is exactly the type of feedback we're looking for. So
> please let us know if you feel we could be adding or subtracting
> tracks as the process goes on.
>
> Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>>
>> You know you can count on me for my $.02...
>>
>> Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in the
>> tracks (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the talks fall
>> into one of eight?
>>
>> #JustAsking
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Gary Kevorkian
>>
>> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>>
>> gkevorki at cisco.com
>>
>> Tel: +3237912058
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png
>>
>>
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>
>> United States
>>
>> Cisco.com
>>
>>
>> ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Think before you print.
>>
>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
>> sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
>> disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
>> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
>> please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of
>> this message.
>>
>> Please click here
>> for
>> Company Registration Information.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Julia Kreger
>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
>> *To: *Amrith Kumar
>> *Cc: *"speakersupport at openstack.org" ,
>> "Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
>>
>> Just my $.01 opinion.
>>
>> The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind. The
>> second seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud
>> category, however that category also has many items at present... so
>> it might also make sense to leave it in Telecom & NFV even though I
>> think the intersection between the proposed topic and the track is
>> not the best alignment.
>>
>> I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the
>> abstracts in Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how many
>> could fit into a Cloud Security or Incident Response category, which
>> could actually lead to some interesting community overlaps if
>> fostered over time.
>>
>> -Julia
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar > > wrote:
>>
>> I submitted track change requests for
>>
>> this talk ,
>> and this talk
>>
>> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>>
>> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't
>> "Public cloud specific". They are certainly more appropriate in
>> Public cloud than in Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the
>> question "How are these Telecom & NFV specific".
>>
>> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
>>
>> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
>>
>> Private & Hybrid Cloud
>>
>> Public Cloud
>>
>> Container Infrastructure
>>
>> Edge Computing
>>
>> OpenDev CI/CD
>>
>> HPC/GPU/AI
>>
>> Telecom & NFV, and
>>
>> Open Source Community
>>
>> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> -amrith
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 578 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 613 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 751 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3945 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL:
From huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net Wed Feb 14 08:53:21 2018
From: huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net (Shuquan Huang)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:53:21 +0800
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Fwd: Private & Hybrid Track
In-Reply-To: <5A83686B.70105@openstack.org>
References:
<5A83686B.70105@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <6A607E97-6773-4409-BA73-35E4DF9EB4C8@99cloud.net>
Thanks Julia. I also went through the huge list and requested track change for some. I just checked the status of them. It’s pending as well.
And this one is also concerning, https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20629?category=210
From: on behalf of Jimmy McArthur
Date: Wednesday, 14 February 2018 at 6:36 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Fwd: Private & Hybrid Track
Thanks Julia! I appreciate you sending it. This is a great example of the type of discussion we would love to see within the Track Chairs ML. It's very valuable for us from the Foundation POV to see these types of discussions b/c it helps us with programming future summits.
Further, it's a great example of really good Track Chair review/communication. For those of you that might be new to the process, Julia nails it :)
Cheers,
Jimmy
Julia Kreger wrote:
Jimmy requested that I send this over to the track chair list. I sent this earlier today upon finishing up sifting through the current state of the Private & Hybrid queue. The fun of multiple email addresses! :)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julia Kreger
Date: Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:53 AM
Subject: Private & Hybrid Track
To: huang.shuquan at 99cloud.net, moreira.belmiro at gmail.com,
ushnishtha at hotmail.com, jimmy at tipit.net
Greetings everyone!
I wanted to let you all know that I've managed to sift through our
huge list of proposed talks. I proposed track changes for a couple
that were definitely better fits in other tracks to the other tracks,
and It looks like a couple are still pending.
I was on the fence on a few of them, and have commented as such where
appropriate. If anyone agrees, we should likely consider requesting a
move of the talk to another track.
There is one submission that is concerning,
https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20951?category=210 I
sent an email to the submitter in an attempt to obtain clarification,
but I've not yet heard back.
One observation that I had from reviewing the proposals was that there
was a strong theme of security and compliance in about 15-20% of the
talks. It might be only because of recent processor vulnerabilities,
but it may be worth recommending that for the fall summit, a security
and compliance track is created.
-Julia
_______________________________________________
Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
_______________________________________________ Openstack-track-chairs mailing list Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From mahati.chamarthy at gmail.com Wed Feb 14 10:30:18 2018
From: mahati.chamarthy at gmail.com (Mahati C)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:00:18 +0530
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To: <2b32f32c-669f-e4b6-22f3-9d6a4eb94975@citynetwork.se>
References:
<9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
<5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
<2b32f32c-669f-e4b6-22f3-9d6a4eb94975@citynetwork.se>
Message-ID:
My $0.02 as well.
Agree, the track categories seem a bit limited. IMO the second talk fits
into Private & Hybrid Cloud category. And the first into perhaps Public
Cloud. I could also see how "Telecom" could fit into those areas of talks
as it is the most popular use case and hence the talk submitter tagging
them with that. As a consequence, it does makes it a bit difficult to find
the "right" category :)
Best,
Mahati
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Tobias Rydberg
wrote:
> Good discussions! Agree that it is sometimes unclear and hard to find a
> suitable track for sessions - interesting sessions for that matter - but
> can become less interesting in the wrong track due to the fact that it
> isn't 100 % relevant.
>
> Have a couple of sessions that are very generic around specific OpenStack
> projects - is that a per definition private, hybrid or public cloud? Is it
> OpenSource community? How would you folks categorize a session like that?
>
> I will make a choice here, but interesting to hear what the rest of you
> thinks!
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
> On 2018-02-13 23:46, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>
> Removing Speaker Support and all the cc's since you're all subscribe to
> the Track Chair list :)
>
> To answer Gary's question... We actually had a pretty even distribution of
> submissions this go round. Obviously Private Cloud and Public Cloud have a
> higher number of submissions, but based on what we've seen, it feels like
> we're getting closer to a good set of tracks.
>
> That said, this is exactly the type of feedback we're looking for. So
> please let us know if you feel we could be adding or subtracting tracks as
> the process goes on.
>
> Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>
> You know you can count on me for my $.02...
>
>
>
> Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in the tracks
> (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the talks fall into one of
> eight?
>
>
>
> #JustAsking
>
>
>
>
>
> [image:
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png]
>
>
>
> Gary Kevorkian
>
> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>
> gkevorki at cisco.com
>
> Tel: +3237912058 <+32%203%20791%2020%2058>
>
>
>
> [image:
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png]
>
>
> [image:
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png]
> [image:
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png]
> [image:
> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png]
>
>
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
> United States
>
> Cisco.com
>
> [image: ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]
>
> Think before you print.
>
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
> reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>
> Please click here
> for
> Company Registration Information.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Julia Kreger
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
> *To: *Amrith Kumar
> *Cc: *"speakersupport at openstack.org"
> ,
> "Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
>
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
>
>
>
> Just my $.01 opinion.
>
>
>
> The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind. The second
> seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud category, however
> that category also has many items at present... so it might also make sense
> to leave it in Telecom & NFV even though I think the intersection between
> the proposed topic and the track is not the best alignment.
>
>
>
> I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the abstracts in
> Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how many could fit into a
> Cloud Security or Incident Response category, which could actually lead to
> some interesting community overlaps if fostered over time.
>
>
>
> -Julia
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar
> wrote:
>
> I submitted track change requests for
>
> this talk , and this
> talk
>
> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>
> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't "Public cloud
> specific". They are certainly more appropriate in Public cloud than in
> Telecom & NFV; for example, I could ask the question "How are these Telecom
> & NFV specific".
>
> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change requests?
>
> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these track names
>
> Private & Hybrid Cloud
>
> Public Cloud
>
> Container Infrastructure
>
> Edge Computing
>
> OpenDev CI/CD
>
> HPC/GPU/AI
>
> Telecom & NFV, and
>
> Open Source Community
>
>
>
> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -amrith
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing listOpenstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing listOpenstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 613 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 751 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 578 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Wed Feb 14 14:19:28 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 08:19:28 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To:
References:
<9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
<5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
<2b32f32c-669f-e4b6-22f3-9d6a4eb94975@citynetwork.se>
Message-ID: <5A844570.6010403@openstack.org>
Another option is to reach out to the speakers and ask them to clarify
how their presentation fits into the particular track they submitted to.
In some cases we have ESL issues or perhaps someone just missed some
details due to the length restriction on the abstract.
Mahati C wrote:
> My $0.02 as well.
>
> Agree, the track categories seem a bit limited. IMO the second talk
> fits into Private & Hybrid Cloud category. And the first into perhaps
> Public Cloud. I could also see how "Telecom" could fit into those
> areas of talks as it is the most popular use case and hence the talk
> submitter tagging them with that. As a consequence, it does makes it a
> bit difficult to find the "right" category :)
>
> Best,
> Mahati
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Tobias Rydberg > wrote:
>
> Good discussions! Agree that it is sometimes unclear and hard to
> find a suitable track for sessions - interesting sessions for that
> matter - but can become less interesting in the wrong track due to
> the fact that it isn't 100 % relevant.
>
> Have a couple of sessions that are very generic around specific
> OpenStack projects - is that a per definition private, hybrid or
> public cloud? Is it OpenSource community? How would you folks
> categorize a session like that?
>
> I will make a choice here, but interesting to hear what the rest
> of you thinks!
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
>
> On 2018-02-13 23:46, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>> Removing Speaker Support and all the cc's since you're all
>> subscribe to the Track Chair list :)
>>
>> To answer Gary's question... We actually had a pretty even
>> distribution of submissions this go round. Obviously Private
>> Cloud and Public Cloud have a higher number of submissions, but
>> based on what we've seen, it feels like we're getting closer to a
>> good set of tracks.
>>
>> That said, this is exactly the type of feedback we're looking
>> for. So please let us know if you feel we could be adding or
>> subtracting tracks as the process goes on.
>>
>> Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>>>
>>> You know you can count on me for my $.02...
>>>
>>> Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in
>>> the tracks (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the
>>> talks fall into one of eight?
>>>
>>> #JustAsking
>>>
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gary Kevorkian
>>>
>>> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>>>
>>> gkevorki at cisco.com
>>>
>>> Tel: +3237912058
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>>
>>> United States
>>>
>>> Cisco.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Think before you print.
>>>
>>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for
>>> the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use,
>>> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If
>>> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
>>> the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and
>>> delete all copies of this message.
>>>
>>> Please click here
>>> for
>>> Company Registration Information.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Julia Kreger
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
>>> *To: *Amrith Kumar
>>>
>>> *Cc: *"speakersupport at openstack.org"
>>>
>>>
>>> ,
>>> "Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
>>>
>>> Just my $.01 opinion.
>>>
>>> The first seems to be more along the lines of HPC in my mind.
>>> The second seems like it might fit in the Private & Hybrid Cloud
>>> category, however that category also has many items at
>>> present... so it might also make sense to leave it in Telecom &
>>> NFV even though I think the intersection between the proposed
>>> topic and the track is not the best alignment.
>>>
>>> I agree regarding the track names. After reading through the
>>> abstracts in Private & Hybrid, I can't but help wonder if how
>>> many could fit into a Cloud Security or Incident Response
>>> category, which could actually lead to some interesting
>>> community overlaps if fostered over time.
>>>
>>> -Julia
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Amrith Kumar
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> I submitted track change requests for
>>>
>>> this talk
>>> , and
>>> this talk
>>>
>>> to Public Cloud from Telecom & NFV.
>>>
>>> The changes were rejected with the message that they weren't
>>> "Public cloud specific". They are certainly more appropriate
>>> in Public cloud than in Telecom & NFV; for example, I could
>>> ask the question "How are these Telecom & NFV specific".
>>>
>>> How do you want us to handle these kinds of track change
>>> requests?
>>>
>>> A more generic issue that I'm seeing is that with these
>>> track names
>>>
>>> Private & Hybrid Cloud
>>>
>>> Public Cloud
>>>
>>> Container Infrastructure
>>>
>>> Edge Computing
>>>
>>> OpenDev CI/CD
>>>
>>> HPC/GPU/AI
>>>
>>> Telecom & NFV, and
>>>
>>> Open Source Community
>>>
>>> it may become hard to decide where to slot some topics.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> -amrith
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5635 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 560 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 727 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 613 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 751 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Wed Feb 14 17:34:54 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:34:54 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] ATTN: Workshop Selection
Message-ID: <5A84733E.3060700@openstack.org>
Hello!
If you are a Programming Committee member of one of the following
tracks, please take a look at this spreadsheet. It contains the title,
abstract, and track of all Workshops submitted. We have very limited
space for workshops, so we're pulling this out of the normal Track Chair
selection process. The count for the number of workshops is on the
second worksheet in the spreadsheet.
We'll be pulling these workshops out of the tracks before Community
Voting since they're not typically voted on. This will also prevent them
from being seen in the Track Chair tool. So please reference the
spreadsheet and ID when letting us know your choices.
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Jimmy
> Jimmy McArthur
> February 13, 2018 at 4:51 PM
> Speaking of things that we could fix for next year.... This Summit we
> had workshops submit under normal tracks, but simply specify that they
> were a workshop under "Presentation Type" dropdown in the submission
> form. Unfortunately, this caused a bit of confusion. As a result,
> we'll be pulling these out of the CFP review and sending them to the
> Presentation Committee Chairs separately with a max number they can
> choose per Track.
>
> The idea is to make sure we have enough workshops to fill the workshop
> space, and avoid having them take up one of your normal presentation
> slots in the schedule.
>
> So... stand by for further communication from myself or Kendall on this.
>
> Thanks!
> Jimmy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: AllTracks-Workshops.xlsx
Type: application/x-msexcel
Size: 22332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From beth.cohen at verizon.com Wed Feb 14 17:58:05 2018
From: beth.cohen at verizon.com (beth.cohen at verizon.com)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:58:05 +0000
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] [E] [OpenStack-track-chairs] ATTN:
Workshop Selection
Message-ID: <4b60b45853f04003803e08bb5aab3aa6@OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
Hi Jimmy –
Seems like lots of duplication here. Not sure there are that many workshops when you take the dups out.
[Verizon]
Beth Cohen
NFV/SDN Network Product Strategy
O +781-466-2055 | M +781-434-8553
beth.cohen at verizon.com
[Twitter] [Instagram]
From: Jimmy McArthur [mailto:jimmy at openstack.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 12:35 PM
To: openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [E] [Openstack-track-chairs] ATTN: Workshop Selection
Hello!
If you are a Programming Committee member of one of the following tracks, please take a look at this spreadsheet. It contains the title, abstract, and track of all Workshops submitted. We have very limited space for workshops, so we're pulling this out of the normal Track Chair selection process. The count for the number of workshops is on the second worksheet in the spreadsheet.
We'll be pulling these workshops out of the tracks before Community Voting since they're not typically voted on. This will also prevent them from being seen in the Track Chair tool. So please reference the spreadsheet and ID when letting us know your choices.
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Jimmy
Jimmy McArthur
February 13, 2018 at 4:51 PM
Speaking of things that we could fix for next year.... This Summit we had workshops submit under normal tracks, but simply specify that they were a workshop under "Presentation Type" dropdown in the submission form. Unfortunately, this caused a bit of confusion. As a result, we'll be pulling these out of the CFP review and sending them to the Presentation Committee Chairs separately with a max number they can choose per Track.
The idea is to make sure we have enough workshops to fill the workshop space, and avoid having them take up one of your normal presentation slots in the schedule.
So... stand by for further communication from myself or Kendall on this.
Thanks!
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jimmy at openstack.org Wed Feb 14 19:02:47 2018
From: jimmy at openstack.org (Jimmy McArthur)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:02:47 -0600
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] [E] [OpenStack-track-chairs] ATTN:
Workshop Selection
In-Reply-To: <4b60b45853f04003803e08bb5aab3aa6@OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
References: <4b60b45853f04003803e08bb5aab3aa6@OMZP1LUMXCA08.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
Message-ID: <5A8487D7.6080209@openstack.org>
Yes - the duplications are b/c of one entry per speaker. I should have
cleaned that up before I sent. But your'e right... there are not a lot
of entries, which is typical for Hands On Workshops. If you look at the
# of selections we need per track on Spreadsheet 2, you'll see it's
reflective of the low number of submissions.
> beth.cohen at verizon.com
> February 14, 2018 at 11:58 AM
>
> Hi Jimmy –
>
> Seems like lots of duplication here. Not sure there are that many
> workshops when you take the dups out.
>
>
> Verizon
>
> Beth Cohen
> NFV/SDN Network Product Strategy
>
> O +781-466-2055 | M +781-434-8553
> beth.cohen at verizon.com
>
> Facebook Twitter
> Instagram
>
> *From:*Jimmy McArthur [mailto:jimmy at openstack.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 12:35 PM
> *To:* openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* [E] [Openstack-track-chairs] ATTN: Workshop Selection
>
> Hello!
>
> If you are a Programming Committee member of one of the following
> tracks, please take a look at this spreadsheet. It contains the title,
> abstract, and track of all Workshops submitted. We have very limited
> space for workshops, so we're pulling this out of the normal Track
> Chair selection process. The count for the number of workshops is on
> the second worksheet in the spreadsheet.
>
> We'll be pulling these workshops out of the tracks before Community
> Voting since they're not typically voted on. This will also prevent
> them from being seen in the Track Chair tool. So please reference the
> spreadsheet and ID when letting us know your choices.
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Thanks!
> Jimmy
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From tobias at citynetwork.se Wed Feb 14 20:52:51 2018
From: tobias at citynetwork.se (Tobias Rydberg)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:52:51 +0100
Subject: [Openstack-track-chairs] Track change requests ...
In-Reply-To: <5A844570.6010403@openstack.org>
References:
<9FB8814E-A13A-4CB9-ABF6-223403F26C04@cisco.com>
<5A836AAD.6060702@openstack.org>
<2b32f32c-669f-e4b6-22f3-9d6a4eb94975@citynetwork.se>
<5A844570.6010403@openstack.org>
Message-ID: <557e2721-9859-25f1-b34e-cd4f89b2f73b@citynetwork.se>
Example below ... this is a pending change request _to_ public cloud
track. Agree that it isn't CI/CD, but doesn't see the clear connection
to public cloud.
https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/20830?category=214
What do you folks think?
Cheers,
Tobias
On 2018-02-14 15:19, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Another option is to reach out to the speakers and ask them to clarify
> how their presentation fits into the particular track they submitted
> to. In some cases we have ESL issues or perhaps someone just missed
> some details due to the length restriction on the abstract.
>
> Mahati C wrote:
>> My $0.02 as well.
>>
>> Agree, the track categories seem a bit limited. IMO the second talk
>> fits into Private & Hybrid Cloud category. And the first into perhaps
>> Public Cloud. I could also see how "Telecom" could fit into those
>> areas of talks as it is the most popular use case and hence the talk
>> submitter tagging them with that. As a consequence, it does makes it
>> a bit difficult to find the "right" category :)
>>
>> Best,
>> Mahati
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Tobias Rydberg
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Good discussions! Agree that it is sometimes unclear and hard to
>> find a suitable track for sessions - interesting sessions for
>> that matter - but can become less interesting in the wrong track
>> due to the fact that it isn't 100 % relevant.
>>
>> Have a couple of sessions that are very generic around specific
>> OpenStack projects - is that a per definition private, hybrid or
>> public cloud? Is it OpenSource community? How would you folks
>> categorize a session like that?
>>
>> I will make a choice here, but interesting to hear what the rest
>> of you thinks!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>> On 2018-02-13 23:46, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>>> Removing Speaker Support and all the cc's since you're all
>>> subscribe to the Track Chair list :)
>>>
>>> To answer Gary's question... We actually had a pretty even
>>> distribution of submissions this go round. Obviously Private
>>> Cloud and Public Cloud have a higher number of submissions, but
>>> based on what we've seen, it feels like we're getting closer to
>>> a good set of tracks.
>>>
>>> That said, this is exactly the type of feedback we're looking
>>> for. So please let us know if you feel we could be adding or
>>> subtracting tracks as the process goes on.
>>>
>>> Gary Kevorkian (gkevorki) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You know you can count on me for my $.02...
>>>>
>>>> Have we over-pivoted from a very high level of granularity in
>>>> the tracks (Boston and Sydney Summits) to now having all the
>>>> talks fall into one of eight?
>>>>
>>>> #JustAsking
>>>>
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/banners/standard/09_standard_graphic.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gary Kevorkian
>>>>
>>>> EVENT MARKETING MANAGER
>>>>
>>>> gkevorki at cisco.com
>>>>
>>>> Tel: +3237912058
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/twitter-16x16.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/webex.png
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/sparks.png
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/icons/jabber.png
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>>>>
>>>> United States
>>>>
>>>> Cisco.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ttp://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Think before you print.
>>>>
>>>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for
>>>> the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use,
>>>> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If
>>>> you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
>>>> for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email
>>>> and delete all copies of this message.
>>>>
>>>> Please click here
>>>> for
>>>> Company Registration Information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Julia Kreger
>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 2:28 PM
>>>> *To: *Amrith Kumar
>>>>
>>>> *Cc: *"speakersupport at openstack.org"
>>>>
>>>>