Open Stack

I'm not sure if i interpret correctly on your email, seems like you are
indicating that your group of track-chair didn't arrange a meeting to
discuss Team list?

In our track, we have two stages (we have been doing this for few Summits):
1. Each individual track-chair make our own list of personal selections.
2. We organized an 1-hour online-meeting to discuss our preferences and
made the final "team list". We have 4 persons in our track. In general, we
first rank those proposal based on track-chair-selected choice. Those
proposal with 3 or 4 track-chair-selected will go into the Team list. Then
we look at those with 2 or 1 track-chair-selected choice and discuss which
should go into the remaining Team list.



On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Carlos Goncalves <
Carlos.Goncalves at neclab.eu> wrote:

> That explains a few things -- thanks, Jimmy!
>
> It is also clear to me now that there was no additional selection stage
> after the “final team list” put together by the Track Chairs.
>
>
>
> As feedback to further improve transparency and facilitate a better and
> faster agreement between Track Chairs:
>
>
>
> - I’d suggest that only sessions with majority of personal selections
> could make to the final team list, i.e. democratic selection process.
> Because, for example, one can add a session directly from his/her
> “Interested” list to the team selection list.
>
> - In addition to existing mechanism that automatically leaves a comment
> when a session makes to team selection, a comment when one is removed would
> also be useful.
>
>
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> *From:* Jimmy McArthur [mailto:jimmy at openstack.org]
> *Sent:* 10 March 2017 16:02
> *To:* Carlos Goncalves
> *Cc:* Erin Disney; openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] What's the presentation selection
> process?
>
>
>
> Carlos,
>
> The "Telecom & NFV Operations" track was one of the first to be finalized,
> but it was done while we were tracking a bug in building the list. Until
> March 8, the "final team list" was listed under Beth Cohen's personal
> selections. I swapped the lists on March 8 so that everything was listed in
> the correct spot.  Additionally, per the Track Chairs for this same track,
> two presentations were merged.
>
> Email from Track Chair Beth Cohen detailing this:
>
> Folks -
>
> The Telecom Track Chair team got together and chose our selections.
> Unfortunately there is something wrong with the list as you can see from
> the attached snapshot. The correct list is all the ones that are marked
> as Yes by Beth Cohen and have a comment that the team selected it. We
> would also like to rank them to show the correct alternatives.
>
> Thank you in advance for looking into this.
>
>
>
> Was there some other issue you heard of?
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
>
> *Carlos Goncalves* <Carlos.Goncalves at neclab.eu>
>
> March 10, 2017 at 8:46 AM
>
> Hey Erin,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
>
>
> I observed two changes in the “Telecom & NFV Operations” track. One
> presentation was demoted from the team selection list, and one promoted to
> team selection list despite having zero personal selections. These changes
> were made between March 6 (afternoon, CET) and March 9 (evening, CET).
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> *From:* Erin Disney [mailto:erin at openstack.org <erin at openstack.org>]
> *Sent:* 10 March 2017 15:22
> *To:* Carlos Goncalves
> *Cc:* Jimmy McArthur; openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] What's the presentation selection
> process?
>
>
>
> Hey Carlos,
>
>
>
> We moved over Track Chair final selections exactly as they were in the
> track with a couple of minor exceptions where speakers already dropped out
> and we had to move alternates in place. Is there some specific track you're
> referencing that had problems? Please feel free to reach out to us with the
> presentations and tracks and we will take a look.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Erin Disney
> OpenStack Marketing
> erin at openstack.org
>
>
>
>
>
> *Erin Disney* <erin at openstack.org>
>
> March 10, 2017 at 8:21 AM
>
> Hey Carlos,
>
>
>
> We moved over Track Chair final selections exactly as they were in the
> track with a couple of minor exceptions where speakers already dropped out
> and we had to move alternates in place. Is there some specific track you're
> referencing that had problems? Please feel free to reach out to us with the
> presentations and tracks and we will take a look.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Erin Disney
> OpenStack Marketing
> erin at openstack.org
>
>
>
> *Carlos Goncalves* <Carlos.Goncalves at neclab.eu>
>
> March 10, 2017 at 4:24 AM
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Could someone from the OpenStack Foundation clarify what is the
> presentation selection process, in particular the final stage?
>
>
>
> My understanding until a few hours ago was that the track chairs
> (empowered by the Foundation) had the last word, or at the very least their
> feedback would be highly weighted in. Same for community vote and
> popularity score.
>
>
>
> The final selections for the “Telecom & NFV Strategy” track had not been
> touched, but others seem to have been.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20170310/19a9995c/attachment-0001.html>