Open Stack

Ah, I see! I've submitted a ticket on our side to make that more clear.

Thank you for the feedback
JImmy

Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> That list does not show the original track, but only the suggested 
> one. Is there a chance to see the original?
>
> Thanks,
> Ildiko
>
>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 19:45, Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org 
>> <mailto:jimmy at openstack.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Ildiko,
>>
>> Yes, this can be seen at the bottom under "Activity Feed" - 
>> http://www.screencast.com/t/ZH77du7boaL
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jimmy
>>
>> Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> One more quick question. Is there a history of what tracks a talk was in previously?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ildiko
>>>
>>>> On 23 Jul 2016, at 19:35, Jimmy McArthur<jimmy at openstack.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Amrith Kumar wrote:
>>>>> Here are two requests for improvement to the tool.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Could we have numbers on the talks on the left panel so it would be easier to scroll. Also, the response from the API request gives a total number of talks, could we display that somewhere "Track: Storage has NNN sessions".
>>>> Great suggestion on the #s. I'll make a note of that for next round and it's something we might be able to add before final selections start. Ditto with totals.
>>>>> 2. Could we make the left panel at least as tall as the right panel? Otherwise when reviewing talks, one scrolls down to look at a talk and the left panel is left far above and one can't access the scrollbar. It would be great if we could make the left panel float down and remain a constant 1 screen tall.
>>>> This one we've gone back and forth on. The reason it's at 50 is b/c of page load. Loading more than 50 talks was taking a bit of time for some users. We can try to increase this, but a lot of tracks don't even have 50 submissions, so you'll never match up anyway. At the end of the day, this was set up as a way to avoid paging (which everyone hated) and still have good performance.
>>>>> A question: What is the ordering of talks in the left panel? Can I assume that if I have reviewed the talks through, for example the talk with a title "Introduction to cooking Pasta in a microwave", then I can come back tomorrow and pick up at the next talk after that one which has the title "Advanced cooking Pasta in a microwave", or is there no guarantee on the ordering, or can talks sneak in above the point where I left off?
>>>> The ordering will be the same for each user. The order is set randomly, per user.
>>>>> It would be good to know if I've already reviewed a talk somehow (gray on the left panel) or if it has been updated since I last reviewed (not gray on the left panel).
>>>> Keep in mind for this phase, you're really only looking for obvious duplicates, presentations that are incomplete, or tests that snuck through. Once you actually start reviewing talks, you can mark them as Yes, No Thanks, or Ignore, which will really allow you sort and filter your reviews.
>>>>
>>>> As far as turning grey, that feature is already there. As you click through each presentation, the title changes to light grey.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a little video explaining both of these concepts:http://www.screencast.com/t/rtzjcgHK
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -amrith
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>>>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
>>>> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-track-chairs/attachments/20160723/7f4d5ad1/attachment.html>