Open Stack

Kyle, if you look at the talk in question, there's no reason (that I can see) for the -1.

Can you?

So I have no idea where that person rated it -1. Was it because he felt it was a product pitch, or because he (or she) felt it lacked content? Was it because it was inappropriate in the track where he (or she) rated it?

Or am I supposed to email that reviewer and ask? Or should we mandate that -1's should have reasons?

All options, not sure what the right one is.

-amrith 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at mestery.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:10 AM
> To: Amrith Kumar <amrith at tesora.com>
> Cc: openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-track-chairs] reset statistics when a talk is
> moved
> 
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Amrith Kumar <amrith at tesora.com> wrote:
> > When a talk is moved from one track to another, I believe that it would
> be a good thing if the ratings on the talk are reset.
> >
> > Consider this talk as an example:
> >
> > https://www.openstack.org/track-chairs/browse/14981?category=73
> >
> > It was given a -1 by someone (I won't mention names because this is
> going to the ML).
> >
> > Also the talk was moved on the request of a reviewer into another track
> (hi reviewer, long time no talk).
> >
> > Now, as I see the talk, it still retains the -1 which is likely no
> longer relevant or appropriate.
> >
> > Yet the -1 is used in computing the talks 'score'.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> I actually disagree and think the -1 still holds value, same as a +1
> would hold value. I'm not sure why you think a track chair's vote
> (even if not in the same track) isn't worth retaining post move to be
> honest.
> 
> > -amrith
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> > Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-
> chairs