Open Stack

Yes, good feedback, it seems to happen every time.  I think one point of confusion is that the Design Summit submissions are not yet open, so there’s no where else to point them. 

If you want to draft up a few sentences that you think might help clarify, we can definitely add it to the submission form for Paris.  I think we used to have more explicit instructions on the submission form, but they dropped off when we updated the system. 

And in the meantime, please feel free to contact those submitters and encourage them to re-submit for the Design Summit instead.  They’ll get the standard notice that their submission has not be accepted, but it might be helpful to provide them with more specific feedback and instructions.

On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Mark McClain <mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'm a co-chair of the compute track.  We had a number of submissions
>> that were perfectly formed and appropriate for the design summit, as
>> opposed to the regular summit tracks.  As a bit of feedback for next
>> time, perhaps the instructions could be enhanced with clarification on
>> what should be submitted to the design summit, instead.
> 
> I’d like to echo this as a we had several networking proposals that would make good design summit sessions.
> 
> mark
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-track-chairs mailing list
> Openstack-track-chairs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-track-chairs