Hello Folks, It seems that we have not received any objection to Thierry’s proposal. (It has been almost 2 weeks) Therefore, I propose to move forward. We will send the commit this week. Is anything else needed from the UC side? Thanks, Edgar On 6/2/16, 1:18 AM, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org> wrote: >Doug Hellmann wrote: >> The point is more that I think it would mix two sets of unrelated >> content. Unless we’re talking about separate repositories that are >> published to a subtree under the governance domain? > >Yes, separate repositories published to subtrees. > >In fact we already plan to build "governance.openstack.org" from data >coming out of 2 repositories (openstack/governance and >openstack/elections) in the near future. Adding a third repository is >definitely a possibility. > >The way I see it we can have: > >- openstack/governance driving the neutral /index.html and /tc/ >- openstack/usercommittee driving /uc/ content >- openstack/elections driving /elections/ content > >each with its own set of approvers. We'd make it clear on the page >footer which repository the page is built from so that people know where >to go to propose changes. > >We'd keep redirects (or aliases) so that existing deep links to >/reference/ and /resolutions/ continue to work. > >How does that sound ? > >-- >Thierry Carrez (ttx) > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-TC mailing list >OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Dtc&d=CwIF-g&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=Ki7KyVa-v4KnsRB_Dg7T8SUdpnwzW1ZkT_pmroX8axA&s=iDBnVKn0j1akeEppZuwMwdYMMH9x80rQt3oZohWjs2M&e=