Open Stack

On 11/25/2014 08:00 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 06:37 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> I was thinking about this, and I think that we should do a spec for
>> the proposed changes in our shiny new spec repo when we've finished
>> the discussion round. That will force us to publicly document things
>> like the problem we think we're solving, which is important for
>> explaining any changes we make to ATCs.
> 
> I think that's a good idea.  Documenting the problem and proposed
> solution in a bit more free text would be a great step to take before
> doing the modifications to the charter to implement it since the
> governance repo changes don't really capture the "why" as well.
> 

+1, though unlike other specs, we probably want to hold for more than
just 2 +2s. :)

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net