Open Stack

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Anita,
>
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 15:50 -0500, Anita Kuno wrote:
> > Currently some of the language found in the TC charter does not yet
> > reflect gender parity[0].
> >
> > I encountered this myself while officiating the TC election,
> > particularly the section on Candidates for PTL seats[1].
> >
> > I move that the language of the TC charter reflect gender parity.
> >
> >
> > [0]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee
> > [1]Candidates for PTL seats
> > Any APC can propose his candidacy for the corresponding program PTL
> > election. Sitting PTLs are eligible to run for re-election each cycle,
> > provided they continue to meet the criteria.
>
> I think it goes without saying that it makes sense to fix this.
> Personally, I'm annoyed I didn't notice this before now.
>
> Care to suggest alternate wording and submit it as a patch to our
> governance repo?
>
> This is the canonical TC charter document:
>
>
> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/charter
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-TC mailing list
> OpenStack-TC at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-tc
>

Agreed, surprising that none of us picked up on that in the past.  Should
be fixed up for sure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/attachments/20131112/b7f5095c/attachment-0001.html>