<div dir="ltr">On 5 April 2013 23:15, Alan Pevec <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:apevec@gmail.com" target="_blank">apevec@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I'd like to throw out some dates for discussion, based on folsom<br>
releases, which was about every 2 months:<br>
<br>
2013.1 Grizzly release Apr 4<br>
2013.1.1 Jun 6<br>
2013.1.2 Aug 8<br>
2013.1.3 Oct 10<br>
<br>
Funnily enough, those Thursdays are all day_in_month# = month# which<br>
is nice to remember.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Alan<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Openstack-stable-maint mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">Openstack-stable-maint@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div>Hi Alan,</div><div><br></div><div>It's looking like there is a steady stream of post release fixes coming through for Grizzly now.  Therefore, I think we should consider a sooner release for the first one.  But then, I still maintain that point releases isn't something that I think is useful.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div>-- <br>Kind Regards,<br><br>Dave Walker <<a href="mailto:Dave.Walker@canonical.com" target="_blank">Dave.Walker@canonical.com</a>><br>Engineering Manager,<br>Ubuntu Server
</div></div>