On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Alan Pevec <apevec at gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-03-24 19:14 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann <doug.hellmann at dreamhost.com>: > > I tend to agree that a dependency change like this is "too big." OTOH, > do we > > have any security ramifications for leaving the code as-is? Would it make > > sense to try to figure out which library is available and use it, rather > > than requiring one or the other? > > That would be stable-only patch so it would be even more risky IMHO. > I guess the solution here is to document security issues clearly in > 2013.2.3 release notes as Adam suggested. > Cheers, > Alan > OK, I can go along with that. Doug -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-stable-maint/attachments/20140324/c028ef81/attachment-0001.html>