Open Stack

On 05/22/2013 10:35 AM, Alan Pevec wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Gary Kotton<gkotton at redhat.com>:
>> I have not looked at the specific case. If the backport is backward
>> compatible then why should it make a difference. That is, the default value
>> should reflect the current state.
>> In some cases a configuration variable is required for certain bug fixes.
> Agreed, adding config parameter on a stable branch would be allowed if
> default stays the same and required for the bugfix, but in this case
> it is not required.
>
>> What am I missing?
> This:
>>> The flag is totally unreleated and actually adds a new "feature",
>>> which is the possibility for admins to forbid multi-attach. However,
>>> the flag has a sane default and doesn't change the default behavior
>>> but it isn't required to fix the bug.

:). Guess I am the village idiot today.
> Cheers,
> Alan