Open Stack

I can't say for sure if other projects follow this but generally I tag each
bug report with grizzly-backport-potential. When I go to do the backport I
remove the tag and target it to the grizzly series and propose it. If the
back port itself is tricky, I sometimes ask the original author to do it.

Vish
On Apr 24, 2013 12:40 AM, "Adam Gandelman" <adamg at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 04/22/2013 02:57 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
>> So there was a session, notes are in etherpad [1]
>>
>> Adam Gandelman (adam_g on irc) and Alan Pevec (apevec on irc) will
>> take over, in turns, managing stable/grizzly releases from markmc.
>>
>> Adam, please join this list
>> http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**
>> openstack-stable-maint<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint>
>> I've added you to openstack-stable-maint in Gerrit, welcome to the team!
>>
>> First stable/grizzly release 2013.1.1 is planned for May 9 - early
>> release to pick up critical Grizzly fixes as suggested by Daviey.
>> That puts stable freeze date on May 2, which is already next week!
>>
>> There are 28 open bugs tagged grizzly-backport-potential [2] out of
>> that 14 have a patch (status In progress).
>>
>
>
> Hi Alan-
>
> Thanks for the follow up and adding me to the team.  I've been looking
> through the bug and patch queues and had a couple of questions:
>
> -  The LP search you linked to only contains bugs with open tasks. Adding
> 'Fix Committed' [1] shows many more that are tagged, fixed in project's
> master but not proposed to stable/grizzly.  I assume we should also make
> sure these get tracked as well?  I see a few relatively small patches that
> seem suitable for stable backport, eg [2]
>
> -  Should core-devs/PTLs be nominating bugs as affecting Grizzly before
> someone else proposes a backport?  Or are we only looking for tags?   I
> couldn't grok the importance of bug tasks / nominations from the wiki.
>  Based on experiences elsewhere in the LP/Ubuntu world, I had assumed a
> Confirmed bug nomination against Grizzly is confirmation from PTL/core-dev
> that the fix is suitable for backporting to stable.
>
> Thanks again,
> Adam
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/**bugs/+bugs?field.status%**
> 3Alist=NEW&field.status%**3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.**
> status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.**status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.**
> status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&**field.status%3Alist=**INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&
> **field.status%3Alist=**INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&**field.status%3Alist=
> **FIXCOMMITTED&field.tag=**grizzly-backport-potential&**
> field.tags_combinator=ANY&**search=Search&orderby=-id&**start=0<https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.tag=grizzly-backport-potential&field.tags_combinator=ANY&search=Search&orderby=-id&start=0>
>
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/**keystone/+bug/1125637<https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1125637>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Openstack-stable-maint mailing list
> Openstack-stable-maint at lists.**openstack.org<Openstack-stable-maint at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**
> openstack-stable-maint<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-stable-maint>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-stable-maint/attachments/20130424/e691b461/attachment.html>