Open Stack

Using a repo name which is consistent with the mailing list tag is also nice, so something like

sig-self-healing

sig at the beginning would also set the name space cleanly for the future (e.g. sig-scientific, sig-product, …)

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Friday, 1 December 2017 at 18:01
To: "openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [self-healing] Storyboard for tracking SIG actions?

    On 16:43 Dec 01, Adam Spiers wrote:
    > Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
    > >On 2017-11-29 09:23:42 +0000 (+0000), Adam Spiers wrote:
    > >[...]
    > >>that could be solved by changing the approach to require the repo
    > >>to exist, even if it's empty and unused.
    > >[...]
    > >>Currently the wiki is probably good enough, but it certainly
    > >>wouldn't do any harm to have a Git repo, and it's not even
    > >>unlikely that we will need one in the future.
    > >[...]
    > >
    > >This has basically been the conclusion in each past discussion where
    > >the topic has arisen. So, with that out of the way, do you have any
    > >idea what you would want the (for now empty/unused) repository
    > >called? I'm happy to submit the change to create that and the
    > >accompanying SB project for you.
    > 
    > That's very kind, thanks!  I guess either "openstack-self-healing" or
    > "openstack-self-healing-sig" should be fine, unless anyone else has
    > any ideas?  In case it's a relevant data point, I was planning to
    > create an #openstack-self-healing IRC channel, so maybe consistency
    > between the names makes sense.
    > 
    > Of course, if the "openstack-" prefix is redundant then we
    > can drop that; would this repository be going under the "openstack/"
    > namespace anyway?  I'm assuming my previous suggestion of creating a new
    > "openstack-sig/" namespace probably doesn't make sense, for good
    > reasons I am not yet aware of.
    
    +1 openstack- prefix is redundant.
    
    -- 
    Mike Perez (thingee)