[openstack-qa] Radware's third party testing system, need a review on tempest test change.

Izik Penso IzikP at Radware.com
Thu Jan 30 21:26:43 UTC 2014


Hello,



We need this small change in tempest test for our 3rd testing system to execute

the test successfully.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68190/

We tested the change with HAPROXY and with our lbaas solution and it

works for both.

Could core reviewer of Tempest, review it please?



Thanks,

Izik Penso.







-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:38 AM
To: Izik Penso
Cc: openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org; OpenStack3RDPartyTesting; mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com
Subject: Re: FW: [OpenStack-Infra] Radware's service account request for third party testing



On 2014-01-27 11:00:51 +0000 (+0000), Izik Penso wrote:

> We need this change in tempest test for our testing system to execute

> the test successfully.

>

> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68190/

>

> We tested the change with HAPROXY and with our lbaas solution and it

> works for both.



It looks reasonable to me, but I'm not a core reviewer for Tempest (you'll want to get input from the QA team on that).



> Should we wait for this change to be merged, until we enable the

> system? Or can we enable the system, modify the test locally and run

> it?



I don't really want to be in the position of deciding who can and can't report on proposed Neutron changes. You will probably want to solicit the blessing of Mark McClain (Cc'd) instead.



> The other problems that were before, start message and URL to logs,

> are resolved now.



Great!

--

Jeremy Stanley

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-qa/attachments/20140130/6f0bc9e5/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-qa mailing list