[openstack-qa] PTL Nomination / Process - throwing my hat in the ring

David Kranz dkranz at redhat.com
Tue Jul 9 17:41:30 UTC 2013


+1 for Sean

On 07/09/2013 07:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Now that QA is an official OpenStack Program we need both a PTL and 
> Program description. My previous suggestion is we handle the PTL part 
> first. That seemed to be generally agreed upon, with the process being 
> that qa-core members are the voters for this.
>
> So I suggest that we open up the PTL process with nominations, with 
> the hopes of getting all nominations by Thursday's QA meeting. If 
> there are multiple nominations we'll organize a vote. If not it will 
> just be consensus based.
>
> I think most folks are around this week, so hopefully this is fine. 
> Realize what we are voting on is the QA PTL for Havana, we'll be doing 
> this again at every release boundary so again in Oct for Icehouse, 
> April for J, etc, etc.
>
> ....
>
> And with that, I'd like to nominate myself for QA PTL for Havana. Over 
> the past couple of cycles I've been focused on the QA team process, to 
> get us tracking towards a release a little bit better, restructuring 
> tempest so that it's clearer from a contribution perspective, and lots 
> of reviews. I've also done a lot of work on non Tempest QA efforts 
> like Grenade and the Devstack gate, the rechecks page 
> (http://status.openstack.org/rechecks/).
>
> I'm currently focused on new tooling to make it easier to find and 
> correlate errors in the OpenStack gate, as well as be able to get us 
> to a point of enforcing that we don't have stack traces in successful 
> runs.
>
>     -Sean
>




More information about the openstack-qa mailing list