[openstack-qa] Please use testtools instead of unittest2 when write new test, no dependence between new tests will be better.

Sean Dague sdague at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Feb 5 21:24:22 UTC 2013


What part still depends on it?

It was removed, and our runs seemed to work.

	-Sean

On 02/05/2013 12:35 PM, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> The reason I added unittest2 to pip-install is because right now tempest
> still depends on it.
> That was not meant to promote development of unittest2 based tests.
>
> andrea
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhu Bo [mailto:bozhu at linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: 05 February 2013 07:30
> To: All Things QA.
> Subject: [openstack-qa] Please use testtools instead of unittest2 when write
> new test, no dependence between new tests will be better.
>
> Hi Stackers:
>       We have used the testtools instead of unittest2 in tempest.
> So when we run tempest, if it require unittest2 packages. We should look
> into why it needs unittest2, and can we use testtools instead? Not just add
> unittest2 in pip-require simply. And new test added into tempest should use
> testtools other than unittest2. We are implementing the bp:speed-up-tempest.
> It will run the tempest in multiple process, so new test won't depend on
> other test will be better. If these new tests must run in a fix order, I
> think we should make them one test.
>
> Thanks & Best Regards
>
> Ivan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-qa mailing list
> openstack-qa at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-qa
>


-- 
Sean Dague
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: sdague at linux.vnet.ibm.com
alt-email: sldague at us.ibm.com




More information about the openstack-qa mailing list