Thank you very much for this cristal clear statement, in the meantime I watched the sidney Octavia session and had answers on side questions.<br><br>The Openstack community is really kickass, thanks everyone!<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 17:52, Michael Johnson <<a href="mailto:johnsomor@gmail.com">johnsomor@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">No issue with using an L2 network for the lb-mgmt-net.<br>
<br>
It only requires the following:<br>
Controllers can reach amphora-agent IPs on the TCP bind_port (default 9443)<br>
Amphora-agents can reach the controllers in the<br>
controller_ip_port_list via UDP (default 5555)<br>
<br>
This can be via an L2 lb-mgmt-net (provider or other) or in some<br>
routing combination.<br>
<br>
I have started work on a detailed installation guide that will cover<br>
these options. Hopefully I can get it done during Rocky.<br>
<br>
Michael<br>
<br>
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:57 AM, Flint WALRUS <<a href="mailto:gael.therond@gmail.com" target="_blank">gael.therond@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Ok, that’s what I was understanding from the documentation but as I couldn’t<br>
> find any information related to the L3 specifics I prefer to have another<br>
> check that mine only x)<br>
><br>
> I’ll have to install and operate Octavia within an unusual L2 only network<br>
> and I would like to be sure I’ll not push myself from the cliff :-)<br>
><br>
> Le mar. 6 févr. 2018 à 10:53, Volodymyr Litovka <<a href="mailto:doka.ua@gmx.com" target="_blank">doka.ua@gmx.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Flint,<br>
>><br>
>> I think, Octavia expects reachibility between components over management<br>
>> network, regardless of network's technology.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 2/6/18 11:41 AM, Flint WALRUS wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi guys, I’m wondering if the Octavia lb-mgmt-net can be a L2 provider<br>
>> network instead of a neutron L3 vxlan ?<br>
>><br>
>> Is Octavia specifically relying on L3 networking or can it operate without<br>
>> neutron L3 features ?<br>
>><br>
>> I didn't find anything specifically related to the network requirements<br>
>> except for the network itself.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks guys!<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Volodymyr Litovka<br>
>> "Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div>