<div dir="ltr">Sure, you can use 'neutron router-gateway-set --disable-snat <publicnetwork>' to disable NAT... just add routes where necessary.<div><br></div><div>Seems like implementation of <span style="font-family:sans-serif">RFC 6598 would occur outside of neutron... maybe on the service provider network between clouds? Perhaps someone from a service provider can provide more information.</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Mike Spreitzer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mspreitz@us.ibm.com" target="_blank">mspreitz@us.ibm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Is there any condition under which a Neutron
router will route packets from a provider network to a tenant network with
destination address unmolested? E.g., non-RFC1918 addresses on the tenant
network?  Does Neutron know anything about RFC6598?</font><br><br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Thanks,<br>Mike</font><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>