<div dir="ltr">I agree with Erik! Source RPM packages from RH are a good option.<div class="gmail_extra"><br>Best,<br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12.8px">.....................................................................<br>JuanFra Rodríguez Cardoso<br><a href="mailto:jfrodriguez@keedio.com" target="_blank">jfrodriguez@keedio.com</a> | <span style="font-size:12.8px">+34 636 692 691</span></div><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12.8px"><a href="http://www.keedio.com/" target="_blank">www.keedio.com</a></div><div dir="ltr" style="font-size:12.8px">.....................................................................</div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 12 November 2015 at 19:57, Leslie-Alexandre DENIS <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:contact@ladenis.fr" target="_blank">contact@ladenis.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Le 12/11/2015 18:26, Erik McCormick a écrit :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've been building these and running them on CentOS for a while,<br>
mainly to get RBD support. They work fine.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Arne Wiebalck <<a href="mailto:Arne.Wiebalck@cern.ch" target="_blank">Arne.Wiebalck@cern.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
What about the CentOS Virt SIG’s repo at<br>
<br>
<a href="http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/</a><br>
<br>
(and the testing repos at:<br>
<a href="http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/</a> )?<br>
<br>
These contain newer versions of the qemu-* packages.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
  Arne<br>
<br>
—<br>
Arne Wiebalck<br>
CERN IT<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 12 Nov 2015, at 17:54, Leslie-Alexandre DENIS <<a href="mailto:contact@ladenis.fr" target="_blank">contact@ladenis.fr</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Hello guys,<br>
<br>
I'm struggling at finding a qemu(-kvm) version up-to-date for CentOS 7 with official repositories<br>
and additional EPEL.<br>
<br>
Currently the only package named qemu-kvm in these repositories is *qemu-kvm-1.5.3-86.el7_1.8.x86_64*, which is a bit outdated.<br>
<br>
As what I understand QEMU merged the forked qemu-kvm into the base code since 1.3 and the Kernel is shipped with KVM module. Theoretically we can just install qemu 2.+ and load KVM in order to use nova-compute with KVM acceleration, right ?<br>
<br>
The problem is that the packages openstack-nova{-compute} have a dependencies with qemu-kvm. For example Fedora ships qemu-kvm as a subpackage of qemu and it appears to be the same in fact, not the forked project [1].<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
In a word, guys how do you manage to have a QEMU v2.+ with latest libvirt on your CentOS computes nodes ?<br>
Is somebody using the qemu packages from oVirt ? [2]<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
See you<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/qemu-kvm" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/qemu-kvm</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7Server/x86_64/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7Server/x86_64/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Thanks everybody for your great inputs, I'll consider the 3 options for our platform.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
See you<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>