<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style id="owaParaStyle" type="text/css">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style>
</head>
<body ocsi="0" fpstyle="1">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">Kind of related, as an op, we see a lot of 3rd party repositories that recently only supported rhel5 move to finally supporting rhel6 because rhel7 came out and rhel5 went to long
term support contract only. This caused us to have to support rhel5 way longer then we would have liked. Now, we're stuck at 6 instead of 7. :/<br>
<br>
Some number of users will stick with juno until it is EOL and then move. Sometimes its because its a desire to not make a change. Sometimes its considered a good thing by the ops that they finally have a "good enough" excuse (EOL) to move forward "finally"
(sigh of relief). :)<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Kevin<br>
<br>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="direction: ltr;" id="divRpF473554"><font face="Tahoma" size="2" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Jesse Keating [jlk@bluebox.net]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, November 06, 2015 10:14 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Dan Smith<br>
<b>Cc:</b> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">We (Blue Box, an IBM company) do have a lot of installs on Juno, however we'll be aggressively moving to Kilo, so we are not interested in keeping Juno alive.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">- jlk</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Dan Smith <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:dms@danplanet.com" target="_blank">dms@danplanet.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
<span class="">> Worth mentioning that OpenStack releases that come out at the same time<br>
> as Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04 + Essex, 14.04 + Icehouse, 16.04 + Mitaka)<br>
> are supported for 5 years by Canonical so are already kind of an LTS.<br>
> Support in this context means patches, updates and commercial support<br>
> (for a fee).<br>
> For paying customers 3 years of patches, updates and commercial support<br>
> for April releases, (Kilo, O, Q etc..) is also available.<br>
<br>
</span>Yeah. IMHO, this is what you pay your vendor for. I don't think upstream<br>
maintaining an older release for so long is a good use of people or CI<br>
resources, especially given how hard it can be for us to keep even<br>
recent stable releases working and maintained.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--Dan<br>
</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>