<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I was afraid of that.<div class="">We’ve got 90 minutes for the breakout sessions - can we treat Large Scale and Public as a single session, and divide it 45-45 or 60-30? </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Geoff</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 6, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Ryan Moats <<a href="mailto:rmoats@us.ibm.com" class="">rmoats@us.ibm.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">Part of the LDT is discussing networking issues with Neutron folks that will not be in the room, so moving it would require re-synchronizing schedules. I'd rather avoid that if possible...<br class=""><br class="">Ryan Moats<br class=""><br class=""><tt class="">Geoff Arnold <<a href="mailto:geoff@geoffarnold.com" class="">geoff@geoffarnold.com</a>> wrote on 08/06/2015 12:37:49 PM:<br class=""><br class="">> From: Geoff Arnold <<a href="mailto:geoff@geoffarnold.com" class="">geoff@geoffarnold.com</a>></tt><br class=""><tt class="">> To: Tom Fifield <<a href="mailto:tom@openstack.org" class="">tom@openstack.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:mordred@inaugust.com" class="">mordred@inaugust.com</a></tt><br class=""><tt class="">> Cc: <a href="mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" class="">openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><br class=""><tt class="">> Date: 08/06/2015 12:38 PM</tt><br class=""><tt class="">> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup <br class="">> (August 18, 19)</tt><br class=""><tt class="">> <br class="">> Well, I’d prefer not to put Public Clouds into the existing HPC <br class="">> slot, because I’m involved in the Product WG discussion that’s <br class="">> scheduled at the same time.<br class="">> <br class="">> Could we put Public Clouds in the Tuesday breakout mix, and Large <br class="">> Deployments in the Wednesday breakout (replacing the HPC WG).<br class="">> <br class="">> Geoff<br class="">> <br class="">> PS Will you be there, Monty? Any preferences?<br class="">> <br class="">> <br class="">> > On Aug 5, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Tom Fifield <<a href="mailto:tom@openstack.org" class="">tom@openstack.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">> > <br class="">> > Thanks Geoff.<br class="">> > <br class="">> > Which session would you propose to replace?<br class="">> > <br class="">> > <br class="">> > Regards,<br class="">> > <br class="">> > <br class="">> > Tom<br class="">> > <br class="">> > On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote:<br class="">> >> I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with<br class="">> >> public cloud operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.)<br class="">> >> As Stefano pointed out yesterday:<br class="">> >> <br class="">> >> <a href="http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/" class="">http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/</a><br class="">> >> <br class="">> >> this is an area which probably needs more attention.<br class="">> >> <br class="">> >> Cheers,<br class="">> >> <br class="">> >> Geoff<br class="">> >> <br class="">> >>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Tom Fifield <<a href="mailto:tom@openstack.org" class="">tom@openstack.org</a><br class="">> >>> <<a href="mailto:tom@openstack.org" class="">mailto:tom@openstack.org</a>>> wrote:<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> Hi all,<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> I've received feedback that maybe there won't be enough HPC folks in<br class="">> >>> Palo Alto to run a 90 minute working session on it :)<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> I would propose to slot in instead one of these three, which are<br class="">> >>> currently not well included on the agenda:<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> 1)<a href="http://apps.openstack.org" class="">apps.openstack.org</a> <<a href="http://apps.openstack.org/" class="">http://apps.openstack.org/</a>>-What the Ops<br class="">> >>> Community would like from it, should we look from the Application<br class="">> >>> side, ie Applications that can run on your cloud, or Augment your<br class="">> >>> cloud, Products that can help enhance your cloud.<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> 2) Openstack Personas (validation) - The UX team will have a set of<br class="">> >>> roles that we would like to validate with the opertator community.<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> 3) Task Taxonomy - The UX team is creating an inventory of<br class="">> >>> "standardized" tasks that can be used to create scenarios and create a<br class="">> >>> common vernacular within the community.<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> Any thoughts?<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> Regards,<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> Tom<br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> On 03/08/15 18:48, Tom Fifield wrote:<br class="">> >>>> Hi all,<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo Alto. If you're<br class="">> >>>> on the fence, hopefully this discussion will get you quickly over the<br class="">> >>>> line so you don't miss out!<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <a href="http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-" class="">http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-</a><br class="">> tickets-17703258924<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> So, I've taken our suggestions and attempted to wrangle them into<br class="">> >>>> something that would fit in the space we have over 2 days.<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> As a reminder, we have two different kind of sessions - General<br class="">> >>>> Sessions, whichare discussions for the operator community aimed to<br class="">> >>>> produce actions (eg best practices, feedback on badness),<br class="">> >>>> and**Working groups**focus on specific topicsaiming to make concrete<br class="">> >>>> progress on tasks in that area.<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> As always, some stuff has been munged and mangled in an attempt to<br class="">> >>>> fit it in. For example, we'd expect to talk about Kolla more<br class="">> >>>> generally in the context of "Using Containers for Deployment",<br class="">> >>>> because there are some other ways to do that too. Similarly, we'd<br class="">> >>>> expect the "ops project" discussion to be rolled into the session on<br class="">> >>>> the user committee.<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Anyway, take a look at the below and reply with your comments! Is<br class="">> >>>> anything missing? Something look like a terrible idea? Want to<br class="">> >>>> completely change the room layout? There's still a little bit of<br class="">> >>>> flexibility at this stage.<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Tuesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus<br class="">> >>>> 9:00 - 10:00 Registration <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 10:00 - 10:30 Introduction <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 10:30 - 11:15 Burning Issues <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 11:15 - 11:55 Hypervisor Tuning <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 11:55 - 12:05 Breakout Explain <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 12:05 - 13:30 Lunch <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 13:30 - 15:00 Large Deployments Team Burning Issues Logging WG<br class="">> >>>> Upgrades WG Ops Guide Fixing<br class="">> >>>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 16:00 - 17:00 Using Containers for Deployment <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 17:00 - 18:00 Lightening Talks <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Wednesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus<br class="">> >>>> 9:00 - 09:45 CMDB: use cases <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 9:45 - 10:30 Deployment Tips - read only slaves? admin-only <br class="">> API servers? <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 10:30 - 11:15 What network model are you using? Are you happy? <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 11:15 - 11:30 Coffee <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 11:30 - 12:15 User Committee Discussion <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 12:15 - 12:20 Breakout Explain <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 12:20 - 13:30 Lunch <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 13:30 - 15:00 Tools and Monitoring Product WG Packaging <br class="">> HPC Working<br class="">> >>>> Group Ops Tags Team<br class="">> >>>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> 16:00 - 17:00 Feedback Session, Tokyo Planning <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> There will be a followup email shortly regarding moderators for the<br class="">> >>>> sessions - thanks to those who volunteered so far!<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Regards,<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> Tom<br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> <br class="">> >>>> _______________________________________________<br class="">> >>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list<br class="">> >>>> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" class="">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br class="">> >>>> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br class="">> >>> <br class="">> >>> _______________________________________________<br class="">> >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list<br class="">> >>> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" class="">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br class="">> >>> <<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" class="">mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a>><br class="">> >>> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br class="">> >> <br class="">> <br class="">> <br class="">> _______________________________________________<br class="">> OpenStack-operators mailing list<br class="">> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" class="">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br class="">> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" class="">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br class=""></tt><br class="">
</p></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>