<div dir="ltr">Absolutely.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:25 AM, George Shuklin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:george.shuklin@gmail.com" target="_blank">george.shuklin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Nice page. <br>
    <br>
    Is jenkins-debian-glue with ubuntu './debian' part is counted as
    valid way to package openstack? They even have separate repo for
    patches and debian-specific files (like control).<div><div class="h5"><br>
    <br>
    <div>On 11/30/2014 04:38 PM, Michael Chapman
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>I've started a wiki page here, please feel free to flesh it
          out with more detail:<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Packaging/GenericTooling" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Packaging/GenericTooling</a><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Looking at the OpenStack meetings page, the schedule is
          very packed with Mondays being a little less loaded. How about
          1500 UTC on Mondays? This clashes with Satori and Zaqar, which
          I hope has minimal overlap with our group. The
          #openstack-operators room would be an appropriate venue, but I
          think we should move to one of the openstack meeting channels
          if the first meeting proves useful and there is a desire for
          more. If we make our first meeting on the 7th of December,
          that gives us plenty of time to list discussion topics.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Since I'm on the wrong side of the world, would anyone like
          to volunteer to lead the discussion? I have created an agenda
          etherpad here, again feel free to add things : <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-operators-meeting-071214-agenda" target="_blank">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-operators-meeting-071214-agenda</a></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I'd like to examine each of the tools to see which
          requirements they don't satisfy, and what the shortest path to
          getting one that ticks every (reasonable) box might be.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div> - Michael</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Emrah
          Aslan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:e.aslan@logicom.com.tr" target="_blank">e.aslan@logicom.com.tr</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
            <br>
            Any progress on reduce the fragmentation ?<br>
            <br>
            Kind Regards<br>
            <br>
            Emrah ASLAN<br>
            Cisco/Citrix System Engineer<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Değerli İş Ortaklarımız,<br>
            Logicom kampanyaları , fırsat, duyuru ve stok bilgilerinin
            sizlere düzenli ulaşması için  aşağıdaki linki tıklayarak 
            e-mail adresinizi güncellemenizi rica ediyoruz.<br>
            <a href="http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001t9egDEMH10MEulnTu-Lzln0RXbiYIgR2HnLd_hpHmPb0K44ZxJOya0FvCOF3TI8c2qeErt1Xrn3PlZqntTSqiSTW40PTK2XQ8OlOUe4qYOE%3D" target="_blank">http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001t9egDEMH10MEulnTu-Lzln0RXbiYIgR2HnLd_hpHmPb0K44ZxJOya0FvCOF3TI8c2qeErt1Xrn3PlZqntTSqiSTW40PTK2XQ8OlOUe4qYOE%3D</a><br>
            <span><br>
              -----Original Message-----<br>
              From: Derek Higgins [mailto:<a href="mailto:derekh@redhat.com" target="_blank">derekh@redhat.com</a>]<br>
              Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 12:35 PM<br>
              To: Jay Pipes; <a href="mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
              Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Operations project:
              Packaging<br>
              <br>
            </span>
            <div>
              <div>On 27/11/14 15:06, Jay Pipes wrote:<br>
                > On 11/24/2014 06:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:<br>
                >> On 18/11/14 06:16, Michael Chapman wrote:<br>
                >>> Hi all,<br>
                >>><br>
                >>> Packaging was one of the biggest points of
                interest in the Friday<br>
                >>> Paris meeting, and I'd like to use this
                thread to have a centralised<br>
                >>> discussion and/or argument regarding
                whether there is a packaging<br>
                >>> system that is flexible enough that we can
                adopt it as a community<br>
                >>> and reduce the fragmentation. This
                conversation began in Paris, but<br>
                >>> will likely continue for some time.<br>
                >>><br>
                >>> The Friday session indicates that as
                operators we have common<br>
                >>> requirements:<br>
                >>><br>
                >>> A system that takes the sources from
                upstream projects and produces<br>
                >>> artifacts (packages or images).<br>
                >>><br>
                >>> There are numerous projects that have
                attempted to solve this problem.<br>
                >>> Some are on stackforge, some live outside.
                If you are an author or a<br>
                >>> user of one of these systems, please give
                your opinion.<br>
                >><br>
                >> To throw another project into the mix, I've
                been working on building<br>
                >> master packages with delorean[1] for a last few
                months(currently<br>
                >> building for fedora but planning on adding
                more), the specs being<br>
                >> uses are based off the RDO packaging.<br>
                >><br>
                >> The plan we're slowly working towards will be
                to allow this packaging<br>
                >> hopefully become the upstream of the RDO
                packaging for the released<br>
                >> projects. We're also hoping to allow
                contributions from the whole RDO<br>
                >> community via gerrithub [2].<br>
                >><br>
                >> If anybody is interested the packaging we are
                maintaining is on<br>
                >> github[3], with a yum repository being created
                for every commit into<br>
                >> the monitored openstack projects[4]<br>
                >><br>
                >> So ya count me in for any discussions
                happening.<br>
                >><br>
                >> [1] <a href="https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean" target="_blank">https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean</a><br>
                >> [2] <a href="https://review.gerrithub.io/" target="_blank">https://review.gerrithub.io/</a><br>
                >> [3] <a href="https://github.com/openstack-packages" target="_blank">https://github.com/openstack-packages</a><br>
                >> [4] <a href="http://209.132.178.33/repos/report.html" target="_blank">http://209.132.178.33/repos/report.html</a>
                (DNS pending)<br>
                ><br>
                > Any reason stackforge wasn't chosen instead of
                another Github organization?<br>
                <br>
                While trying to figure out the process having it on a
                github org was an advantage for a number of reasons for
                example we started out with a small set of packaging
                repositories and added as needed, creating these is a
                lot quicker on github, adding stackforge repositories
                would have been slower, we've also renamed a couple of
                repositories and deleted others<br>
                <br>
                In future as things settle down and we get a better view
                of whats needed, I'm open to moving to stackforge.<br>
                <br>
                ><br>
                > Best,<br>
                > -jay<br>
                ><br>
                > _______________________________________________<br>
                > OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
                > <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                > <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operator</a><br>
                > s<br>
                <br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>