<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier new,monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Stuart Fox <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stuart@demonware.net" target="_blank">stuart@demonware.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'">This sounds cool but wouldn't it put cinder in the data path if you are replicating across vendors? </span></p>

</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace">​Agreed, this is the challenge, and I'm leaning towards not going the "cross vendor" path at this time.  Wondering if this is a deal breaker for people?</div>

<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace">Thanks,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace">

John​</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>

<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'">--</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'">BR,</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'">Stuart </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;text-indent:0px"><span style="font-family:'NokiaPureTextLight'"> </span></p></div><div><div class="h5"><br><div><p>On 14-07-28 3:01 PM gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:<br>


</p></div></div></div><div><div><div class="h5"><div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
On 07/26/2014 11:28 AM, John Griffith wrote:<br>
> Hey OS-Operators,<br>
> <br>
> There are two features being worked on currently that I'd love to get<br>
> some feedback on:<br>
> <br>
> 1. Replication<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
i would like to Cinder to be able to replicate data between different<br>
backend storages.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
sometimes your DR site does not have the same storage backend as your<br>
primary site, this is common when you rent the DR site.<br>
the usual workaround for this is restore from backup over the DR<br>
storage, which is painful and slow.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
ideally i would have a Fast dedicated storage on primary site and a<br>
bunch of lun(s) attached to a box with iscsi+lvm to provide volumes to<br>
compute nodes.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
if i have storage from the same 'vendor' on both sites that's great!<br>
cinder could offload data replication to vendor's appliance<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
i know is a pony what i'm asking for, but i would really make a difference<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
</div>
</div></div><div><div><div class="h5">
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333<br>
<br>
<br></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div class="">
<div>
OpenStack-operators mailing list<br>
</div>
<div>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</div></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>