<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I think having images backended in swift or S3 would be a prerequisite for having multiple glance workers.<div>I've seen it where using file backend causes problems when images get stored to one node, and compute tries to launch from another.</div><div><br></div><div>Secondly, you could either use DNS RR or some sort of LB to have your endpoint be something generic like "<a href="http://glance.example.com">glance.example.com</a>"</div><div><br><div><div>On Mar 18, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Ahmad Ahmadi <<a href="mailto:ahmadidamha@yahoo.com">ahmadidamha@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; ">Hi,<br><br>How can I have multiple glance nodes in a way that, when I
create an image from the controler, it would be coppied to all of the
glance nodes?<br>Now, when I define multiple glance endpoints in the controler (keystone), the images would only go to the first glance node.<br><br>I also want to avoid putting the name of all glance nodes in the nova nodes.<br><br>Thank you,<br>Ad<br><div id="RTEContent"><img src="http://www.sharemation.com/Ahmadbut/Ahmad_Ahmadi.gif?unq=-vc9zlo"> </div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>OpenStack-operators mailing list<br><a href="mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org</a><br>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>