[Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

Fox, Kevin M Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov
Thu Oct 25 15:31:15 UTC 2018


Would it make sense to move the control plane for this piece into the cluster? (vm in a mangement tenant?)

Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________________
From: Florian Engelmann [florian.engelmann at everyware.ch]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:39 AM
To: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and VxLAN without DVR

It looks like devstack implemented some o-hm0 interface to connect the
physical control host to a VxLAN.
In our case there is no VxLAN at the control nodes nor is OVS.

Is it a option to deploy those Octavia services needing this conenction
to the compute or network nodes and use o-hm0?

Am 10/25/18 um 10:22 AM schrieb Florian Engelmann:
> Or could I create lb-mgmt-net as VxLAN and connect the control nodes to
> this VxLAN? How to do something like that?
>
> Am 10/25/18 um 10:03 AM schrieb Florian Engelmann:
>> Hmm - so right now I can't see any routed option because:
>>
>> The gateway connected to the VLAN provider networks (bond1 on the
>> network nodes) is not able to route any traffic to my control nodes in
>> the spine-leaf layer3 backend network.
>>
>> And right now there is no br-ex at all nor any "streched" L2 domain
>> connecting all compute nodes.
>>
>>
>> So the only solution I can think of right now is to create an overlay
>> VxLAN in the spine-leaf backend network, connect all compute and
>> control nodes to this overlay L2 network, create a OVS bridge
>> connected to that network on the compute nodes and allow the Amphorae
>> to get an IPin this network as well.
>> Not to forget about DHCP... so the network nodes will need this bridge
>> as well.
>>
>> Am 10/24/18 um 10:01 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:33 PM Engelmann Florian
>>> <florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>> <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On the network nodes we've got a dedicated interface to deploy VLANs
>>>     (like the provider network for internet access). What about creating
>>>     another VLAN on the network nodes, give that bridge a IP which is
>>>     part of the subnet of lb-mgmt-net and start the octavia worker,
>>>     healthmanager and controller on the network nodes binding to that
>>> IP?
>>>
>>> The problem with that is you can't out an IP in the vlan interface
>>> and also use it as an OVS bridge, so the Octavia processes would have
>>> nothing to bind to.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>     *From:* Erik McCormick <emccormick at cirrusseven.com
>>>     <mailto:emccormick at cirrusseven.com>>
>>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 6:18 PM
>>>     *To:* Engelmann Florian
>>>     *Cc:* openstack-operators
>>>     *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] [octavia][rocky] Octavia and
>>>     VxLAN without DVR
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 12:02 PM Florian Engelmann
>>>     <florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>     <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Am 10/24/18 um 2:08 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
>>>          >
>>>          >
>>>          > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:14 AM Florian Engelmann
>>>          > <florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>>>
>>>          > wrote:
>>>          >
>>>          >     Ohoh - thank you for your empathy :)
>>>          >     And those great details about how to setup this mgmt
>>> network.
>>>          >     I will try to do so this afternoon but solving that
>>>         routing "puzzle"
>>>          >     (virtual network to control nodes) I will need our
>>>         network guys to help
>>>          >     me out...
>>>          >
>>>          >     But I will need to tell all Amphorae a static route to
>>>         the gateway that
>>>          >     is routing to the control nodes?
>>>          >
>>>          >
>>>          > Just set the default gateway when you create the neutron
>>>         subnet. No need
>>>          > for excess static routes. The route on the other connection
>>>         won't
>>>          > interfere with it as it lives in a namespace.
>>>
>>>
>>>         My compute nodes have no br-ex and there is no L2 domain spread
>>>         over all
>>>         compute nodes. As far as I understood lb-mgmt-net is a provider
>>>         network
>>>         and has to be flat or VLAN and will need a "physical" gateway
>>>         (as there
>>>         is no virtual router).
>>>         So the question - is it possible to get octavia up and running
>>>         without a
>>>         br-ex (L2 domain spread over all compute nodes) on the compute
>>>         nodes?
>>>
>>>
>>>     Sorry, I only meant it was *like* br-ex on your network nodes. You
>>>     don't need that on your computes.
>>>
>>>     The router here would be whatever does routing in your physical
>>>     network. Setting the gateway in the neutron subnet simply adds that
>>>     to the DHCP information sent to the amphorae.
>>>
>>>     This does bring up another thingI forgot  though. You'll probably
>>>     want to add the management network / bridge to your network nodes or
>>>     wherever you run the DHCP agents. When you create the subnet, be
>>>     sure to leave some space in the address scope for the physical
>>>     devices with static IPs.
>>>
>>>     As for multiple L2 domains, I can't think of a way to go about that
>>>     for the lb-mgmt network. It's a single network with a single subnet.
>>>     Perhaps you could limit load balancers to an AZ in a single rack?
>>>     Seems not very HA friendly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>          >
>>>          >
>>>          >
>>>          >     Am 10/23/18 um 6:57 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
>>>          >      > So in your other email you said asked if there was a
>>>         guide for
>>>          >      > deploying it with Kolla ansible...
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > Oh boy. No there's not. I don't know if you've seen my
>>>         recent
>>>          >     mails on
>>>          >      > Octavia, but I am going through this deployment
>>>         process with
>>>          >      > kolla-ansible right now and it is lacking in a few
>>> areas.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > If you plan to use different CA certificates for
>>>         client and server in
>>>          >      > Octavia, you'll need to add that into the playbook.
>>>         Presently it only
>>>          >      > copies over ca_01.pem, cacert.key, and client.pem and
>>>         uses them for
>>>          >      > everything. I was completely unable to make it work
>>>         with only one CA
>>>          >      > as I got some SSL errors. It passes gate though, so I
>>>         aasume it must
>>>          >      > work? I dunno.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > Networking comments and a really messy kolla-ansible /
>>>         octavia
>>>          >     how-to below...
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:09 AM Florian Engelmann
>>>          >      > <florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>
>>>          >     <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>>> wrote:
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >> Am 10/23/18 um 3:20 PM schrieb Erik McCormick:
>>>          >      >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:53 AM Florian Engelmann
>>>          >      >>> <florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>
>>>          >     <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>>> wrote:
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> Hi,
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> We did test Octavia with Pike (DVR deployment) and
>>>         everything was
>>>          >      >>>> working right our of the box. We changed our
>>>         underlay network to a
>>>          >      >>>> Layer3 spine-leaf network now and did not deploy
>>>         DVR as we
>>>          >     don't wanted
>>>          >      >>>> to have that much cables in a rack.
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> Octavia is not working right now as the lb-mgmt-net
>>>         does not
>>>          >     exist on
>>>          >      >>>> the compute nodes nor does a br-ex.
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> The control nodes running
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> octavia_worker
>>>          >      >>>> octavia_housekeeping
>>>          >      >>>> octavia_health_manager
>>>          >      >>>> octavia_api
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >     Amphorae-VMs, z.b.
>>>          >
>>>          >     lb-mgmt-net 172.16.0.0/16 <http://172.16.0.0/16>
>>>         <http://172.16.0.0/16> default GW
>>>          >      >>>> and as far as I understood octavia_worker,
>>>          >     octavia_housekeeping and
>>>          >      >>>> octavia_health_manager have to talk to the amphora
>>>         instances.
>>>          >     But the
>>>          >      >>>> control nodes are spread over three different
>>>         leafs. So each
>>>          >     control
>>>          >      >>>> node in a different L2 domain.
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> So the question is how to deploy a lb-mgmt-net
>>>         network in our
>>>          >     setup?
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> - Compute nodes have no "stretched" L2 domain
>>>          >      >>>> - Control nodes, compute nodes and network nodes
>>>         are in L3
>>>          >     networks like
>>>          >      >>>> api, storage, ...
>>>          >      >>>> - Only network nodes are connected to a L2 domain
>>>         (with a
>>>          >     separated NIC)
>>>          >      >>>> providing the "public" network
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>> You'll need to add a new bridge to your compute
>>>         nodes and create a
>>>          >      >>> provider network associated with that bridge. In my
>>>         setup this is
>>>          >      >>> simply a flat network tied to a tagged interface. In
>>>         your case it
>>>          >      >>> probably makes more sense to make a new VNI and
>>>         create a vxlan
>>>          >      >>> provider network. The routing in your switches
>>>         should handle
>>>          >     the rest.
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >> Ok that's what I try right now. But I don't get how
>>>         to setup
>>>          >     something
>>>          >      >> like a VxLAN provider Network. I thought only vlan
>>>         and flat is
>>>          >     supported
>>>          >      >> as provider network? I guess it is not possible to
>>>         use the tunnel
>>>          >      >> interface that is used for tenant networks?
>>>          >      >> So I have to create a separated VxLAN on the control
>>>         and compute
>>>          >     nodes like:
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >> # ip link add vxoctavia type vxlan id 42 dstport 4790
>>>         group
>>>          >     239.1.1.1
>>>          >      >> dev vlan3535 ttl 5
>>>          >      >> # ip addr add 172.16.1.11/20 <http://172.16.1.11/20>
>>>         <http://172.16.1.11/20> dev vxoctavia
>>>          >      >> # ip link set vxoctavia up
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >> and use it like a flat provider network, true?
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      > This is a fine way of doing things, but it's only half
>>>         the battle.
>>>          >      > You'll need to add a bridge on the compute nodes and
>>>         bind it to that
>>>          >      > new interface. Something like this if you're using
>>>         openvswitch:
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > docker exec openvswitch_db
>>>          >      > /usr/local/bin/kolla_ensure_openvswitch_configured
>>>         br-mgmt vxoctavia
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > Also you'll want to remove the IP address from that
>>>         interface as it's
>>>          >      > going to be a bridge. Think of it like your public
>>>         (br-ex) interface
>>>          >      > on your network nodes.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >  From there you'll need to update the bridge mappings
>>>         via kolla
>>>          >      > overrides. This would usually be in
>>>         /etc/kolla/config/neutron. Create
>>>          >      > a subdirectory for your compute inventory group and
>>>         create an
>>>          >      > ml2_conf.ini there. So you'd end up with something
>>> like:
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > [root at kolla-deploy ~]# cat
>>>          >     /etc/kolla/config/neutron/compute/ml2_conf.ini
>>>          >      > [ml2_type_flat]
>>>          >      > flat_networks = mgmt-net
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > [ovs]
>>>          >      > bridge_mappings = mgmt-net:br-mgmt
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > run kolla-ansible --tags neutron reconfigure to push
>>>         out the new
>>>          >      > configs. Note that there is a bug where the neutron
>>>         containers
>>>          >     may not
>>>          >      > restart after the change, so you'll probably need to
>>>         do a 'docker
>>>          >      > container restart neutron_openvswitch_agent' on each
>>>         compute node.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > At this point, you'll need to create the provider
>>>         network in the
>>>          >     admin
>>>          >      > project like:
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > openstack network create --provider-network-type flat
>>>          >      > --provider-physical-network mgmt-net lb-mgmt-net
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > And then create a normal subnet attached to this
>>>         network with some
>>>          >      > largeish address scope. I wouldn't use 172.16.0.0/16
>>>         <http://172.16.0.0/16>
>>>          >     <http://172.16.0.0/16> because docker
>>>          >      > uses that by default. I'm not sure if it matters since
>>>         the network
>>>          >      > traffic will be isolated on a bridge, but it makes me
>>>         paranoid so I
>>>          >      > avoided it.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > For your controllers, I think you can just let
>>> everything
>>>          >     function off
>>>          >      > your api interface since you're routing in your
>>>         spines. Set up a
>>>          >      > gateway somewhere from that lb-mgmt network and save
>>>         yourself the
>>>          >      > complication of adding an interface to your
>>>         controllers. If you
>>>          >     choose
>>>          >      > to use a separate interface on your controllers,
>>>         you'll need to make
>>>          >      > sure this patch is in your kolla-ansible install or
>>>         cherry pick it.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >
>>>          >
>>> https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/commit/0b6e401c4fdb9aa4ff87d0bfd4b25c91b86e0d60#diff-6c871f6865aecf0057a5b5f677ae7d59
>>>
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > I don't think that's been backported at all, so unless
>>>         you're running
>>>          >      > off master you'll need to go get it.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >  From here on out, the regular Octavia instruction
>>>         should serve you.
>>>          >      > Create a flavor, Create a security group, and capture
>>>         their UUIDs
>>>          >      > along with the UUID of the provider network you made.
>>>         Override
>>>          >     them in
>>>          >      > globals.yml with:
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > octavia_amp_boot_network_list: <uuid>
>>>          >      > octavia_amp_secgroup_list: <uuid>
>>>          >      > octavia_amp_flavor_id: <uuid>
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > This is all from my scattered notes and bad memory.
>>>         Hopefully it
>>>          >     makes
>>>          >      > sense. Corrections welcome.
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      > -Erik
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >>
>>>          >      >>>
>>>          >      >>> -Erik
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >      >>>> All the best,
>>>          >      >>>> Florian
>>>          >      >>>> _______________________________________________
>>>          >      >>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>          >      >>>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>         <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>>>          >     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>         <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
>>>          >      >>>>
>>>          >
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>          >
>>>          >     --
>>>          >
>>>          >     EveryWare AG
>>>          >     Florian Engelmann
>>>          >     Systems Engineer
>>>          >     Zurlindenstrasse 52a
>>>          >     CH-8003 Zürich
>>>          >
>>>          >     tel: +41 44 466 60 00
>>>          >     fax: +41 44 466 60 10
>>>          >     mail: mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>
>>>          >     <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>>
>>>          >     web: http://www.everyware.ch
>>>          >
>>>
>>>         --
>>>         EveryWare AG
>>>         Florian Engelmann
>>>         Systems Engineer
>>>         Zurlindenstrasse 52a
>>>         CH-8003 Zürich
>>>
>>>         tel: +41 44 466 60 00
>>>         fax: +41 44 466 60 10
>>>         mail: mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
>>>         <mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch>
>>>         web: http://www.everyware.ch
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>

--

EveryWare AG
Florian Engelmann
Systems Engineer
Zurlindenstrasse 52a
CH-8003 Zürich

tel: +41 44 466 60 00
fax: +41 44 466 60 10
mail: mailto:florian.engelmann at everyware.ch
web: http://www.everyware.ch



More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list