[Openstack-operators] UC WG/Team Requirements

Blair Bethwaite blair.bethwaite at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 13:09:51 UTC 2017

Thanks for sharing Melvin,

One major point here is that it's not clear how this proposal relates
to the recent discussion around OpenStack SIGs. It's clear that more
than a few of us are still struggling to understand intuitively why we
are calling one thing a Working Group and another a Team, even when
there are specific some requirements listed against them. Perhaps part
of the problem is that the monikers themselves convey no meaning? I
wonder if we could we do away with Team and instead have SIGs and
Working Groups...?


On 13 July 2017 at 07:01, Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> Please take time today to offer any additional comments/questions/concerns
> to the following document -
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r3KwaG-SbvaKCuAE52XwPCF7cRGDrNRg6dUhPQWs0vU
> This document establishes the requirements for current and future UC
> governed working groups and teams. We need to ensure we have this done
> before upcoming UC election so your feedback is greatly appreciated.
> --
> Kind regards,
> OpenStack User Committee
> (Edgar, Jon, Melvin, Shamail, Shilla)


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list