[Openstack-operators] What would you like in Pike?

Jonathan Bryce jbryce at jbryce.com
Mon Jan 16 21:02:52 UTC 2017

> On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 1/12/2017 7:30 PM, Melvin Hillsman wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>> I am hoping to get a dialogue started to gain some insight around things
>> Operators, Application Developers, and End Users would like to see
>> happen in Pike. If you had a dedicated environment, dedicated team, and
>> freedom to choose how you deployed, new features, older features,
>> enhancements, etc, and were not required to deal with customer/client
>> tickets, calls, and maintenances, could keep a good feedback loop
>> between your team and the upstream community of any project, what would
>> like to make happen or work on hoping the next release of OpenStack
>> had/included/changed/enhanced/removed…?
> I just wanted to say thanks for starting this thread. I often wonder what people would like to see the Nova team prioritize because we don't get input from the product work group or Foundation really on big ticket items so we're generally left to prioritizing work on our own each release.

I agree; thanks Melvin! Great input so far.

Matt, on the input on big ticket items, I’d love to get your feedback on what is missing or you’d like to see more of in the Foundation reports or Product Working Group roadmaps to make them more useful for these kinds of items. Is this thread more consumable because specific functionality is identified over themes? Is it the way it’s scoped to a release? We could possibly even add in a similar question (“What would you like to see in the next release?”) to the user survey if this is info you’ve been looking for.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20170116/89d4eeb0/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list