[Openstack-operators] [craton] Versions of Python to support for Craton

sean roberts seanroberts66 at gmail.com
Fri May 27 00:13:59 UTC 2016


I can make the request a move rather than copy. Then anyone landing at the
old repo get redirected to the new.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jim Baker <jim.baker at python.org> wrote:

> We will want to move the main repo to OpenStack infra, with the usual
> mirror to github.com/openstack/craton. I don't think we need to worry
> about mirroring to github.com/rackerlabs/craton as well. A simple
> reference there pointing to the new location should suffice.
>
> Basically I'm just trying to keep disruption to the dev team to
> zero/minimum.
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:31 PM, sean roberts <seanroberts66 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> True, we will want to wait if we want decide to move or copy the
>> rackerlabs/craton repo. I can create the project patch and then pin it so
>> it doesn't get merged.
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jim Baker <jim.baker at python.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Sean, thanks for your help here, it's very much appreciated!
>>>
>>> The move then should be straightforward once we get past our first
>>> milestone, on or around June 10; but any prep in advance sounds good.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, sean roberts <seanroberts66 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Now that we have settled on the name, setting up the project
>>>> infrastructure is straightforward. I have done this a few times and am
>>>> ready to do it for craton.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Jim Baker <jim.baker at python.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Sam Morrison <sorrison at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m in favour of using 3.5. We are in the process of moving things to
>>>>>> ubuntu xenial and 3.5 is native there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW when is Craton planning on getting into openstack gerrit etc?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The specific timeline of the move to gerrit is not something we have
>>>>> actively discussed, because of the usual: we are trying to complete our
>>>>> phase 1 milestone. Currently we are projecting June 10 (based on Monte
>>>>> Carlo modeling), but this could slip. In any event, once we finish
>>>>> milestone 1, moving to OpenStack Gerrit and infrastructure in general ASAP
>>>>> would make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, it should be quite soon!
>>>>>
>>>>> - Jim
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ~ sean
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ~ sean
>>
>
>


-- 

~ sean
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160526/ed2c4b45/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list