[Openstack-operators] Nova-network -> Neutron Migration

Shamail itzshamail at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 20:31:07 UTC 2016


Sorry for the top posting...  I wanted to make a suggestion:

Would this script be suited for OSOps[1]?  The networking guide could then reference it but we could continue to evolve/maintain it as an operators tool.

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Osops

Thanks,
Shamail 

> On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Cool! I'd like to see this stuff in the networking guide... or at least a link to it for now.
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) <kevinbri at cisco.com> wrote:
>> Hey All!
>> 
>> I wanted to follow up on this. We've managed successfully migrated Icehouse with per tenant networks (non overlapping, obviously) and L3 services from nova-networking to neutron in the lab. I'm working on the automation bits, but once that is done we'll start migrating real workloads.
>> 
>> I forked Sam's stuff and modified it to work in icehouse with tenants nets: https://github.com/kevinbringard/novanet2neutron/tree/icehouse. I need to update the README to succinctly reflect the steps, but the code is there (I'm going to work on the README today).
>> 
>> If this is something folks are interested in I proposed a talk to go over the process and our various use cases in Austin: https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/presentation/7045
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/9/15, 12:49 PM, "Kevin Bringard (kevinbri)" <kevinbri at cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >It's worth pointing out, it looks like this only works in Kilo+, as it's written. Sam pointed out earlier that this was what they'd run it on, but I verified it won't work on earlier versions because, specifically, in the migrate-secgroups.py it inserts into the default_security_group table, which was introduced in Kilo.
>> >
>> >I'm working on modifying it. If I manage to get it working properly I'll commit my changes to my fork and send it out.
>> >
>> >-- Kevin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On 12/9/15, 10:00 AM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I did not but more advanced could mean a lot of things for Neutron. There are so many possible scenarios that expecting to have a “script” to cover all of them is a whole new project. Not sure we want to explore than. In the past we were recommending to
>> >> make the migration in multiple steps, maybe we could use this as a good step 0.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Edgar
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>From: "Kris G. Lindgren"
>> >>Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 8:57 AM
>> >>To: Edgar Magana, Matt Kassawara, "Kevin Bringard (kevinbri)"
>> >>Cc: OpenStack Operators
>> >>Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Nova-network -> Neutron Migration
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Doesn't this script only solve the case of going from flatdhcp networks in nova-network to same dchp/provider networks in neutron.  Did anyone test to see if it also works for doing more advanced nova-network configs?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>___________________________________________________________________
>> >>Kris Lindgren
>> >>Senior Linux Systems Engineer
>> >>GoDaddy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
>> >>Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 9:54 AM
>> >>To: Matt Kassawara <mkassawara at gmail.com>, "Kevin Bringard (kevinbri)" <kevinbri at cisco.com>
>> >>Cc: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>> >>Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Nova-network -> Neutron Migration
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Yes! We should but with a huge caveat that is not not supported officially by the OpenStack community. At least the author wants to make a move with the Neutron team to make it part of the tree.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Edgar
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>From: Matt Kassawara
>> >>Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 8:52 AM
>> >>To: "Kevin Bringard (kevinbri)"
>> >>Cc: Edgar Magana, Tom Fifield, OpenStack Operators
>> >>Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Nova-network -> Neutron Migration
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Anyone think we should make this script a bit more "official" ... perhaps in the networking guide?
>> >>
>> >>On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri)
>> >><kevinbri at cisco.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Thanks, Tom, Sam, and Edgar, that's really good info. If nothing else it'll give me a good blueprint for what to look for and where to start.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>On 12/8/15, 10:37 PM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Awesome code! I just did a small testbed test and it worked nicely!
>> >>>
>> >>>Edgar
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>On 12/8/15, 7:16 PM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>On 09/12/15 06:32, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) wrote:
>> >>>>> Hey fellow oppers!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I was wondering if anyone has any experience doing a migration from nova-network to neutron. We're looking at an in place swap, on an Icehouse deployment. I don't have parallel
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I came across a couple of things in my search:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/MigrationFromNovaNetwork/HowTo <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/MigrationFromNovaNetwork/HowTo>
>> >>>>>
>> >>http://docs.openstack.org/networking-guide/migration_nova_network_to_neutron.html <http://docs.openstack.org/networking-guide/migration_nova_network_to_neutron.html>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> But neither of them have much in the way of details.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Looking to disrupt as little as possible, but of course with something like this there's going to be an interruption.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If anyone has any experience, pointers, or thoughts I'd love to hear about it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -- Kevin
>> >>>>
>> >>>>NeCTAR used this script (https://github.com/NeCTAR-RC/novanet2neutron )
>> >>>>with success to do a live nova-net to neutron using Juno.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>_______________________________________________
>> >>>>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> >>>>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> >>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> >>>_______________________________________________
>> >>>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> >>>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> >>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> >>_______________________________________________
>> >>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> >>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> >OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160217/c1a939a2/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list