[Openstack-operators] User Survey - Deadline Feb 24th

Edgar Magana edgar.magana at workday.com
Tue Feb 9 16:20:40 UTC 2016


No, that is not the case. There is not Enterprise version of OpenContrail. Therefore, this question could split the responses because it is confusing.

Edgar

From: Joe Topjian <joe at topjian.net<mailto:joe at topjian.net>>
Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
Cc: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>>, "openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack at lists.openstack.org>>, OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>, "community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>" <community at lists.openstack.org<mailto:community at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] User Survey - Deadline Feb 24th

Isn't it similar to asking if you use Fedora, CentOS, or RHEL?

My understanding is that Juniper offers a paid/supported version of Contrail while OpenContrail is the open source version.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
Tom,

For the "Which OpenStack Network (Neutron) drivers are you using?” section.

What is the difference between using Juniper and OpenContrail?. There should be only OpenContrail or something like OpenContrail/Juniper.

Thanks,

Edgar




On 2/9/16, 1:33 AM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>If you run OpenStack, build apps on it, or have customers with OpenStack
>deployments, please take a few minutes to respond to the latest User
>Survey or pass it along to your friends.
>
>Since 2013, the user survey has provided significant insight into what
>people are deploying and how they're using OpenStack. You can see the
>most recent results in the October 2015 report[1].
>
>
>Please follow the link and instructions below to complete the User
>Survey by ***February 24, 2016 at 23:00 UTC***. If you already completed
>the survey, there's no need to start over. You can simply log back in to
>update your Deployment Profile, as well as take the opportunity to
>provide additional input. You need to do this to keep your past survey
>responses active, but we hope you'll do it because we've made the survey
>shorter and with more interesting questions ;)
>
>
>
>Take the Survey ( http://www.openstack.org/user-survey )
>
>
>All of the information you provide is confidential to the Foundation and
>User Committee and will be aggregated anonymously unless you clearly
>indicate we can publish your organization’s profile.
>
>Remember you can hear directly from users and see the aggregate survey
>findings by attending the next OpenStack Summit, April 25-29 in Austin
>(http://www.openstack.org/summit).
>
>Thank you again for your support.
>
>
>-Tom
>
>PS, an RT of https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/695751431542874112
>helps too :)
>
>[1]
>https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/survey-2016-q1/landing?BackURL=%2Fuser-survey%2Fsurvey-2016-q1%2F
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160209/8b2d6610/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list